Don't get whats wrong with the single-player. o.o
Camping is actually less of an issue for me since there is no stopping power. In the previous games, you'd have campers with one-hit kills (or one-burst-kills), and you'd have to use nades to flush 'em out. Without stopping power, I can actually react to the first bullet and out-play the camper.
It's strange how some people say that CoD is all an idiotic run-around-and-shoot-things-mi ndlessly type ...
You'd think someone with a gaming PC would already know this stuff.
Oh well, interesting nonetheless.
It's not funny because he talks fast, it's because he actually makes humorous points (ofcourse, humour is subjective).
His judgments have been accurate thus far.
... good to know people still miss the point and still rage at him.
How else do you think tables are born?
Well, I guess I'll just throw in what I've learned from CoD4.
It seems it is best to set maxfps to the lowest FPS you can manage.
So if your FPS doesn't dip below 125, then set maxfps to 125.
Then, maxpackets must be a factor of maxfps.
Thus, with maxfps of 125, the possible values of maxpacket are:
125/1 = 125 (not possible as maxpackets must be less than 100)
125/2 = 62.5 ~ 63
125/3 = 41.6 ~ 42
...etc
They want to make money.
That's a shocker. =x
Been using most of those commands since day 1.
Also, "/maxpackets 100" isn't exactly the best command to use.
Using lower numbers (50~60 instead of 100) might actually be better.
Many companies have lay offs after a huge release.
That's how business works, it's nothing new and it isn't something Kotick started.
I thought they were getting around the bush problem by doing it all in an urban environment?
I think you might've missed the point as well.
I know there is not much money to be made on the PC, I accept that. I even pointed that out. You didn't have to 'fix' anything.
The discussion right now is what the lead platform should be (or rather, why 360 is picked). I merely said that if they wanted to create the 'best' games, they'd use a PC as lead to take advantage of all the capabilities and then port them onto the consoles. H...
I've been playing the game.
Haven't run into as many bugs as NewVegas (I still found NV to be enjoyable)
On a PC too.
Try playing the game before throwing your opinion around as if it was a fact.
Or you can continue basing your opinion on conjecture and then call anyone who disagrees a "drone", it's your life afterall.
I think you're just repeating his argument. (even if he did articulate it in a pro-360 tone)
It's that neither console has "higher standards", it's the same brainless shenanigans that dominate sales at either ends.
...atleast I hope that was his argument. He couldn't have been oblivious to the other side of the coin... right? =x
I was much more shocked at seeing a grenade launcher mounted on an SMG.
Reminded me of Half-Life.
If they were worried about making the best games, they'd be working with PCs.
As it stands, it's all about the money. By making 360 the lead platform, it's easier to port over the stuff to PS3.
Thus, they can easily make a multiplat and rack sales in the process, that's how the story goes.
Edit: It's easier to develop for the 360 (or atleast, thats what I keep hearing) making it a much less painless process to make the game. Portin...
The cake is a pie?
Blasphemy!
I need a portal to the new future...
I've been saying this ever since Burnout and Black.
It's not necessarily the fact that they make good games (that'd be an opinion) but they've done something different with each game's genre instead of following what the genre usually does.
Burnout took racing out of the simulation slump it was falling in since the original Gran Turismo.
Black went for the more over-the-top appeal rather than the realism-based one WW2 shooters were...
Minecraft has sold like... half a million 'copies'?
... and it's an incomplete game! Not even beta yet.
I wouldn't mind if they did something similar to minecraft. As long as the total price (game + miniDLCs) equals that of the new finished game...
Your point is that there is no (or very little) 360 exclusives.
Your point is... a fact... that is easily visible.
It's just a cheap jab to get a reaction, and that's the sign of a troll. Rather than looking at your own plate, you felt the need to mock another's.
... and I guess I would be the feeder. *sigh*
... people die in war, yet we're voluntarily subjective ourselves to war in video games.
Not sure how you can draw such a clear-cut line.
I'm not saying these guys are right for making the game. It's just that we've jumped off the fringe of decency already.