Ms has nothing to do with Valve releasing L4D2 so early. MS just approved it most likely. I'm certain they didn't force Valve to do this. hell if they were going to force Valve to make a game, it'd be Half Life 3. That'd make a much bigger splash.
Actually not a bad list. Good that MGS4 got in.
Hehehe
hehehehe
stupid ass reggie hehehe
That 3 year deal was in 2002. GTa 4 was released 2008, and the earliest it was gonna be released was 2007. + The contract was terminated so that GTA San Andreas could go to the ORIGINAL xbox. Not GTA4 going to the 360. GTA 4 was never bound to the ps3.
Since the terms of the agreement were undisclosed -according to your link- we don't know if Sony got free exclusives out of it. Nor does your link say who terminated the contract. And since Rockstar doesn't mind telling people they...
If you're referring to Gta4, Sony never had a deal about GTA being exclusive to Sony consoles. Rockstar is making agent exclusive because they believe that new ip's stand a better chance when they are exclusive. Why they chose Sony i don't know, but they say they are because they have faith in Sony, not because sony forced them into it.
their so sensitive to violence because of what happened in WW2. Germany certainly isn't proud of WW2 nor the holocaust. Its a bad memory that they will never fully shake, and this is the result.
Surprisingly he makes a good point. But I doubt MS would fake natal, imagine the sh!t they'd be in if they did.
But really, doesn't anyone else find a little boy trapped in your TV a little creepy?
How the hell would you know?
Why is it taking so long for your bubbles to go down?
They really need to stop judging the conferences by how fun they are to watch. Its the information that I watch them for, not must see tv.
That doesn't mean I believe his grades are wrong. I just wouldn't put Sony so low. They showed games, and lots of em. Isn't that what G4 always says they need to do?
funny thing about the "word on the street" - its usually BS. I'm in high school, so i know about gossip, and i know most of it's lies and false info.
How in the f*ck is FF14 exclusivity a bad thing? Honestly, if Square wanted it to go multi, they would of announced it multi. Its not like FF it a ps exclusive franchise no more.
The motion controller was awesome. What the wii should of been. Natal, though impressive, doesn't detract at all from the the device.
FF7 for psn a bad thing? Now your being retarded.
"I just don't care for MAG" Good f*cking for you. Obviously loads of other people do....
Neither company dominated each other. I will go ahead and say it, you are a biased idiot if you think otherwise.
Although, Nintendo did get its ass kicked, once again.
i think Sony won but only because Kojima and his obvious lack of love for MGS:Rising. It really takes off some of the power of that announcement when the man behind the series is showing an obvious disdain for that title.
Other than that, Ms could of showed some new ip's, that's all the conference lacked.
B+ for MS
A for Sony
Not. Gonna. Work.
Its at least a B. New Ip's or not.
I would think that they would change some of their policies regarding DRM. It would be a mistake not too.
But I agree with you. Disks for me, whether it be on the wii, 360, or ps3.
1) I can take a disk with me to a friends house
2) trade it in if I want
3) the 360 has had some minor technological issues since its release and even if they changed their drm and policies i still think that mistakes will be made (even MS is human) and some consumers will be ...
If you thinks critics are underrating Natal, you are an idiot.