"Bruce Wayne:
For the first time in the Arkham series the player will be able to explore Gotham city unmasked. Cruise around the streets of Gotham as Bruce Wayne in fancy cars to investigate before you embark on missions."
That feels made up.
HITMAN. I've been saying this for years. Screw movies... a new hit every week.
Also shows they're excited about their product.
Love this kind of stuff.
This is more of a broad observation but it's funny that when an article points out the lack of something, that suddenly becomes a HUGE deal.
If there was an article saying that in Last of Us ND didn't create fully rendered human innards and that all characters were just shells, people would then be saying "yeah TLoU was okay but no rendered human innards really made it feel dated".
Possibly due to them trying to hit launch and not having the dev time to focus on demos. It's not like they just go File > Make Demo > Send Demo Out
Because the price drop is WITH kinect bundled in. So why didn't they just launch at the reduced price anyway? It just shows that A) they're hurting bad and B) Kinect should be an option
Where does it end? What are the parameters?
Are you saying they could launch on day one, then on day two release a game for free, ignoring those that just bought it the day before?
What's the acceptable timeframe? I say a year. but 4 months? That's pushing it. Especially with the highest quality exclusive you have ATM.
Sure. Definitely. Certainly isn't because making a demo takes a considerable amount of resources to make happen, especially with an open world game. On a game that sells itself because the developers have a good rep for making great games.
They mentioned streaming a trial of a game as a demo (guessing more like ps+'s 1 hour trial on ps3) but that would involve gaikai which they're still working on with playstation now.
Of all things to get upset about over, this is among the silliest. Personally, I'd rather them focus on the game resume function from sleep mode.
@Lukas I wouldn't put too much faith in that claim. Plenty of ps4 gameplay footage out there that proves otherwise. You don't think there's a chance that's ps3 footage?
@jack, wouldn't they just not say anything at all then if they disliked being with Sony?
Yeah cause that's definitely not previous gen version you're comparing with... smh
Must suck to have to be so superficial about games that you can't enjoy them. I don't ever want to review games.
I like enjoying games. This one's been a blast.
by "permanent damage" in RF, do you mean the buildings you destroyed were just gone and it was if they were never there?
I think the damage that is permanent in SS will be a bit more involved than "object that was here is now not here and there is no trace of evidence it ever was here"
Fallout 3 took me 14 hours to beat because I only did main quest stuff. It pays to do more.
I'll take all 3. Ahthankyou.
I've played with one a while. It's unnecessary. It's hilariously big, and honestly, with proper UI design there's absolutely NO need for a second screen. Any novelty payoff is far overshadowed by cost it adds to production & price.
It doesn't even have proper triggers. It's a bad controller.
I'm confused... the game looks great. From trailers to gameplay videos. What's the fuss about?
Doesn't matter what they say, haters have made up their minds and will bash the game all the way until midnight release when they go buy it.