Something tells me this'll be saved under a "things that aged poorly" file.
1.) GTA and Call of Duty aren't officially 18+
2.) If they hit the FCC's guidelines for advertising why can't they be mentioned here?
I think this is the right way. Or make it even more complex than just websites and include whole categories (opinion pieces, rumors, etc.)
"Anyone can create a website, write their opinion and post ot on n4g."
That's not really the case. It's not like every user creating a blogspot site gets instant access. There's at least some background or accreditation required.
A: Number 2
I only dislike this one for that potential of *false/questionable* rumors being commented on, making us have to clean up that stuff afterwards or users unnecessarily venting altogether.
B: Number 2
I don't see the big deal of more people discussing them than news. I mean...that seems to be where most go to air their disagreements. So long as the ire being shared isn't misleading or harmful to anyone.
*Groan*
We know, we know. DmC was a thing.
Compared to this nonsense? George Lucas comes off as relatively tame--and has more of a leg to stand on in regards to how he paved the way for modern blockbusters today.
1.) Where are you getting this data?
2.) What's impressive about such information in today's over-saturated review market? A better game like Sekiro winning at The Game Awards would hold just as much weight in this numbers game as '360N0SC0PExxgamers.com 9; awarding Death Stranding a GOTY.
3.) While I understand yearning for 'new and different' experiences in games, why should that be some kind of shield against dismissing it?...
Could just be taking their time with it. :/
Panda!!! :D
More of the latter, but there's potential to bring some of the OG team back.
I decided to read the article in full after this comment. I've got to ask: where is this mind-reading even coming from? Sure, there's whining about some of their 'twitter jokes' but it's not framed in this hostile way of freeing the readers from their shackles or anything. It's just him extolling some of their questionable aspects (crunch being among the most valid the more I hear about their conditions) that maybe not everyone knows about.
But to...
To an extent, I'd say yeah. Sure, this generation has been diabolical in regards to delays, but that should only reemphasize my point. TLOU Pt. II has a much more confident release date with May 2020 and that's after a delay. All we have on Breath of the Wild 2 in comparison is rumors that it'll launch somewhere in Fall 2020.
At least each of the other games listed have posted release dates or release windows for this year.
C'mon now...how are you going to include Breath of the Wild 2 when there's not even a firm 2020 release date? It runs contrary to your article's title.
*Select LA Noire Doubt Option*
;)
1.) Matt Booty recently stated that, not "you guys."
2.) The full quote provides some necessary context.
I don't know what it is about this guy. He's like a glutton for punishment, but doing so with the purpose to defend consumers' bottom line.
Absolute reviewing unit.
The VGChartz staff & community was certainly with you! :)
Not really though. The Switch craze has been going on with more intensity than the Wii craze since 2017. Xbox One's selling mojo deflated in 2018.
Well, I'm certainly glad you enjoyed it. I saw the BIG reveal coming tbh. But then again, I just kinda stumbled upon that digital comic in the main menu which hints at it really early.