That's unfair to call out a site as if it were "waiting" for Uncharted 3, as if this is fueled by bias. I'd say it's more of a retread when PSN Pass/Ubisoft Pass were announced a few months ago, and now they're harking back to it because of Arkham City's online pass debacle.
This sounds a bit perposterous imo. Reviewers in all categories (books, movies, games, etc.) are under the notion that they're reviewing this product with the "new" mentality in mind. Movie critics can't anticipate the quality of a bootlegged movie or DVD that may have a few scratches (for the sake of using an example of both pirated and used copies); furthermore, game critics shouldn't mind those aspects when reviewing a game.
No review site has eve...
I have never heard that phrase from anyone before this article. Am I the only one?
This pseudo-flamebait wouldn't even be accepted as a blog here. Now that's saying something.
Can you really criticize TOR for having less content than WoW when considering WoW has had 3 huge expansions.
Indeed. Great review btw :)
This might be the first game I rate higher than you :P.
I garuntee the scores in MW3 will not be of the same quality as 2.
Never asked you to love it, only pointing out that "haters gonna hate". Requiring a piece of hardware to have hardcore games in order for you to love or not hate it just shows how many n4g posters have a severe case of tunnel vision.
Although I don't flock to the motion control threads, not once have I seen posters attack the Kinect for not being "fun" but instead "casual". This shows you how just how deeply rooted fanboyism seems to be...
As always, haters gonna hate.
You know guys, this information falls under the "+" bubble of helpful *wink*. Just saying
That's what hurt me the most as well. You have this awesome gameplay that sticks out from the rest of the '11 shooters, yet you get rid of the innovative co-op of R2 AND thin the competitive MP number to 16 max from the impressive 60 from R2. Still a great game imo.
8 to 9 hours on Normal if you don't want to click on the link.
I see your viewpoint is terribly miscontrued on what you think "making more choices down the road" means. Christians, for the sake of example, are even encouraged to search for God (not verbatum) in all details of life, thereby encouraging more freedom of thought. Buying into the rationalization that Christians "just take it on faith" falsely inclines people to believe atheists are already right, which isn't really the case. Philosophers, Theologians, Scientists, ps...
Read the parentheses in the "Overall" score column.
Religion could be introduced in a subtle way if writers took the time to think about it. It's tough to find a game so calculated as the likes of...Gran Turino (1st one that came to mind) when including popular religions.
"I would argue about UC2's story [not being memorable]..."
"...but the kind of cliched garbage that gamers seem to think is a good or memorable story these days makes it pointless."
Man, I wish we could create sigs on here. This is priceless.
"That’s right, as with religion and politics, fanboyism is one big choice that removes the need to make more, just as important, choices down the road."
Although I enjoyed the blog, I found this part to be utterly false, regardless of rather or not you elaborate on this. Choosing a religion or political stance does not instantly remove the need to make more choices down the road; instead, I contend it requires you to face more daunting choices rather than walking...
It's not semantics for the heck of it. You ask "Story is not memorable?" in your first post, then challenge the reviewer to name a game with better storytelling. These are two completely different facets in art forms.
"So why the question have not been asked at that time?"
It has been...I'm not sure what else to say.
"And you think the online pass is just a new feature initiated on the PSN or by ubisoft?"
I know when this fiasco slowly started. Whether you're reading when I've written, or reading between the lines, I'm not sure how you could've come to the conclusion that I was insinuating [your quote] in the ...