"first" month? will there be more? i thought the switch was pretty much DOA minus some zelda fans?
i like how the switch sales seem to be so low that a random blogger is able to use words like "many" - which implies he counted them all manually and talked to all of them. maybe i misjudged bloggers after all.
thanks for saving me the click!
i'm not using paypal on psn and i got this little incentive to spend more where you rather don't want to spend something because nothing will be of interest within the next few months ;-)
how do you know that sony did not pay money for the exclusivity? after all, that is how exclusivity-deals are working.
micky$oft just lost their grip after their 360 era where they made every second major game a timed exclusive. at least it felt that way. in the meantime they focused on everything else but gaming. now their production teams are gone and new ones too expensive to build up or buy.
what we are left with is a gaming console that just so happe...
games. thanks for this no-info-article.
cowboy themed games are already boring asf. now throw in another mindnumbingly dated pseudo dialogue system, repetitive quests and i'm off. struggling with horizon at the moment because of exactly that. really tired of open word games that do just the same: fill the map with all kinds of meaningless quests and hope that people still want that. i guess it's too much asked when i'd like to see something that brings the genre forward instead of just treading water with an updated gfx...
delusional, much?
and my wallet staying closed is another effect of their bad business decisions.
i like how all the n-fans are dreaming of a pumped up, up to the technical standards and times zelda game. something nintendo will never give them. and in turn start to pray "y'know me is preferring substance over style" to everybody and their mother. so pathetic. most of them paid around 400 bucks to play that substandard version of what they really wanted.
while these are indeed major titles, i still think ps+ is an overall bad deal. considering how few titles i played over the years that were plus-titles: when i am not buying a game when it's new it will certainly not get any better (and suddenly be worth of my time and therefore money) just because someone removed the pricetag. most people are greedy and just want more, so this service is working overall. but for me, it's a worthless service. i am not playing online and the games are ...
i mean, my personal opinion is: people are infinitely dumb. but, most of us are able to learn. it can take a while, but sometimes even the dumbest one realizes that something is odd and starts "switching" to other products/manufacturers. that's why i think the majority is done with nintendo. still say less than 10 million units sold during its lifecycle.
the headline os so sad when you think about it
most of these poor zeldaddicts paid more than the 380.-, they also swallowed up the peripherals. most of them paid nearly 500 bucks to play a freaking zelda game.
no, blind brand obedience is
now that''s a bold assumption. maybe he is just like me who comes to this comments section to see the game getting bashed for its lack of reason to exist?
thanks for the heads up. the article's headline gave that already away.
the switch is likely to sell less than 10 million in its lifecycle finding its place in history as another n-flop. the scorpio also got no incentive to be owned by anyone other than xbone owners. it iscompletely beyond me howgaming console manufacturers can screw up their own core business: games. by not caring about their catalogue.
hell yes. can't wait to see the day when everything gets streamed without dedicated hardware. future is looking bright.
nier o'tomata must be one of the hightlights this gen leaving the one or the other boring sony-first-party-exclusive in the dust. but i don't do DLC's, so whatevs.