is it just me or are these internet bloggers getting lamer by the day?
if it werent for the kids with no income who need to trade their games in to being able to play new ones (but stating how plastic and discs with dust so appeals to them) we would already be in the fine place that ganes only get distributed digitally anymore.
easy: stop blogging and start up your snes then. seriously.
when i hear soulslike i get underwhelmed
i never (well, okay, once,.. saw, laughed, sold it) used a bluetooth controller with my ipad. (and there are enough zelda clones out there for the pad). why would i go and buy a switch to do the same uncomfy thing with an overpriced dedicated games-only-machine? has anyone ever tried remote play with the vita? technically it works very well, you just can't decipher a damn thing on that tiny screen. so i highly doubt this is a different experience than when you switch vom starionary to mob...
outsourced pile of subpar crap. we don't need such products. but i am betting most gamers just start drooling when they will see their mass effect logo and they will throw money at the production team and they will get this signal "please give us more of your substandard work, we are going to pay for it, no matter what". and soon we will see mass effect: whatever.
yes, because the zelda formula is beyond stale. it's like a wachowski movie. take elements of every other game there is and see if the conglomerate sticks. personally, i was always pretty bored of the zelda formula. but the power of branding is the one thing that saved nintendo time and again. people need brands to feel better about themselves. no branding, no nintendo. this is all good and well, it's just nothing the common gamer is profiting from.
it sets the standard how it was 10 years ago, agreed.
you know, there wasa time when gamers were still gamers.seeing the credits roll was the ultimate reward. now people who achieved some utter crap in games get rewarded with a shiny tropy icon and an overall gamerscore. but yet some bulbs want to get rewarded for the reward. find the mistake here.
if people would only send a signal and not buy this game... next time they would not omit quality control. everyone who is buying it deserves exactly what he/she will be getting.
the vita was DOA. the switch was DOA. when will console manufacturers realize that handhelds are over and done. apple took the cake about 10 years ago. no mobile gadget can break their reign. console manufacturers can cater to a small niche of diehards who like to take their handheld everywhere they go. but this is demographic is never big enough to call it a successful gadget. there will be no vita 2 for given reasons. nintendo is too stubborn to acknowledge that there is a competition. that...
it's the fourth game in a franchise. name me ONE title that had a 4 in the title that was actually worth the money? i can't think of one. therefore i will not buy this game. others who will and then afterwards start complaining: do it somewhere else, please. you've been warned.
the switch sales are on the decline after the zelda fans got their day-one-fix? now i'm surprised. as in LOL.
sorry, no serious online infrastructure, no 3rd party relations = no purchase. i am fed up with their embarrassing approach by ignoring the competition and thus failing every standard there is.
oh my god. this title has got EVERY red flag there is... indie-one-man-production is the first, the next one is procedural generated content and another one was time-limited-gameplay to artificially tighten the atmosphere. each of these mentioned red flags usually makes me puke. but here it seems they cramped all the red flags together they could find. i mean, lol.
i would like to see the devs seperating their offline from their online portions in games. they could do them both standalone. so i would not always be forced to ignore parts of my games (the online parts). would be fair because online portions in games almost always take out the fun that was inside. because of people.
the last time i cared about a game manual was when i was 12 or so.. and that was 30+ years ago. i don't even care for retail games anymore. been digital for years now. but i can understand that the kids who got no money are dependent on the ability to buy and sell used games so they get around their low "income".
thanks for saving me the click to a boring article with just 1 little piece of info ;-)
short answer: third party :P
after all the catastrophic and abysmal first impression ratings we should click this bait? i don't think so.