I asked about this in the forum and got somewhat of an answer, seems the BC is going out the window, basically the 40 GB that we know now is going to be bumped up with a double HD, and that's all, the rest is the same. Still leaves us with one SKU, and no BC in it, unless you can catch a MGS4 bundle, which is still very attractive, even though you could buy a $130 PS2, get 100% compatibility, you'd still be missing the mem card port, 2 extra USB drives, and you'd have 2 consoles taking up spa...
care to tell me why I didn't find something funny?
That was "housed" in a gamecube casing, doesn't mean it's a gamecube "running" Wii games, get real about that....I will be the first to agree that Wii lacks some noticable horsepower compared to the PS3/360 stuff, but also the first to swear that you won't find a GC game that looked as good as Metroid Prime 3 or Smash Bros. Brawl or The Conduit...the GC could NOT have pulled off those. Look it up people, it's only a beefed up GC, but remember the portion of "BEEFED UP...
is why I wanted to comment. I've never laughed out loud at a news title at N4G before..."Gamesave Done Blowed Up!" funniest thing I've seen on this site in a while.
don't have a 360, so won't comment on the third, but the better campaign was actually 2's for me, because 1 was so bland and repetetive, all those rooms that looked the same, copy and pasted, pissed me off. But, I'd give the first a 7.5, and the second one an 8...the first one's final driving climax where Master Chief had to drive through the entire area to safety was one of the most aggravating levels in my video game life. The second had the dual wielding, bigger environments, and a little ...
It probably feels like what you said (parts only been worked on for a short amount of time) because SK had to go back to the drawing board very recently on the game. I haven't played it myself but knowing the history of the game's development, I wouldn't be surprised if pieces felt new and pieces felt old.
thinks that because it's an opinion, just as your opinion is that he sucks. I think he's good, but he's no Tom Hanks or Denzel Washington.
His voice doesn't sound like Max Paynes from the game, but it doesn't has to, if he looks the part it'll just be a different interpretation of the IP, just like the Bourne game that came out didn't feature a digital Damon.
your guarantee, Miss Cleo? I give everything a shot until I make a judgement for yourself, do you not do the same? Do you judge how someone looks, and not even give them a chance too? Suddenly you're a psychic who knows all (You don't know what that snipet of the angel was...Behind Enemy Lines kicked ass, and Flight of the Phoenix was decent but not great...and PG-13 doesn't inherently ruin every movie, is every single fav movie of yours R? Batman Begins was PG13)
The games kic...
Anyone who claims this could run on last gen hardware has to remove their cranium from their bum, the game looks gorgeous for what it is, and hopefully busts down the wall of devs not pushing the Wii's power (it is spec-wise better than ANYTHING last gen)
Perfect Dark 1 didn't make top TWENTY?!! WTH?!
And where's Donkey Kong Country 1-3, or the Donkey Kong Lands for the GB (the ones with original levels)
if you're so confident in the integrity of hardware, you shouldn't have to pick up any store warranties. Is that to go along side of the other things that DON'T come with a 360 out of the box (like wifi and free online and a charger)? I'm NOT a fanboy, and support all consoles, but a fanboy from any console is just obnoxious, the narrowmindedness is akin to racism, honestly. I wish I could have confidence in the 360, I will get one eventually, but RROD is STILL an issue (even mentally), even ...
version of the game is more at risk IMO than a hard copy. At least the hard copy cannot be erased or corrupted by accident or a crash of some sort, I wouldn't trust my purchase to a hard drive, but I can at least be in total control of a disc that's tangible. This is why I don't believe downloadable content will beat HD movies on disc, it's too risky.
consider the God of War 3 advertisement on the back of the Chains of Olympus manual as official.
I see no numbers anywhere except in the guys posts below. I figured it was one of those multipage ones, I'm advanced enough with computers to navigate well. Hmm, I use Internet Explorer, 7.0.6000.......oh well whatever. I probably know about all 7 other games already.
something I'm missing on the link, I see them talk about 3 games, SC 4, Fable 2, and Gears 2, then the article stops, I can't seem to locate any link or scroll bar or anything. I'm usually the type to not miss that sort of thing but I'm confused on this one, where are the other 7 games?
Rogue Agent, it was decent, not spectacular, but I'm an enormous FPS fan. I'd honestly rank it as maybe a 7.0 or even 8.0. I had it on Xbox 1. I had fun with that game and its campaign. It lacked a lot, but was mostly solid where it counted IMO (needed more weapons, better AI, more extras, more production value). Nothing like Rare's GoldenEye, but a good game. I know that's unpopular for an opinion, but it's my opinion and I don't form them off what they are expected to be.
but is no replacement for GoldenEye, better graphics, yes, better tech, yes, better weapons, possibly, but fun factor? Not close.
Besides Future Perfect isn't BC, so you're stuck.
Yes, this is what I'm looking for, wth? This "teaser" is pointless....Ted Price shows true Resistance....to info...I would like to see gameplay please.
the AUTHOR'S top 25 of all time, opinion is a meaningful word people, look it up.
people are assuming he won't play the game means he has no clue how the game looks/feels/sounds/plays...?
Who's to say he hasn't already watched someone working on the film play through the two games, he seemed to have somewhat of an understanding on the monologues from Max Payne in the trailer. How does "I won't play the game" equate to "I won't watch the game played or research my role"? Now this assumption "confounds" me.