believed*
not a ps3 exclusive, i am quite sure it is on pc too
pepsi, coke is dire over here its made from thames water.
except the fact there WILL BE NO premium service :/
which was obvious from the start. some xbox fanboy said sony were going to charge for it
http://n4g.com/ps3/News-448...
now somebody please ban whoever idiot posted this.
and all you idiots who beleaved this which is obviously a troll can drown yourselves
i vaguely remember seeing that before, i think it is total bs.
infact i doubt sony would release a premium service at all. the 100% free online is one of the main benefits of a ps3 - they aren't stupid enough to mess it up. Plus they wouldnt announce it before christmas. this is some microsoft fanboy troll
its quite clearly the best game on the wii.
no, now that the economy is starting to recover. That is obviously what they are pretending games will end up costing so that they essentially cost the same as they do now :P
Actually wait a second. I am a programmer and have worked on various systems. How is it physically possible to make that error, surely the price would be a predefined integer field and expected to be in units of microsoft points; what kind of retarded microsoft programming means it is possible to throw a dol...
OVERhyped? Some of those games were masterpieces.
ODST was a bit of a lazy production, but it has outstandingly good gameplay - which is the #1 thing I look for in a halo game.
Brutal Legend was a comedy and environmental masterpiece.
Fair enough eps from liberty city is highly over marketed by m$, but the episodes themselves are some of the best DLC I have ever seen - however I will not be buying them as m$ are just too evil for me to satisfy with my mony.
fail post. stop posting articles on your advert filled rubbish site. you missed operation flashpoint 2: which, behind mw2 was the most dissapointing. If anybody thought any of those games were going to be good before they came out then they obviously paid too much attention to the marketing bs.
mw2 is ok... but its basically just an improved version of mw1. the dedicated server issue is an overwhelming fail though - though it doesn't affect me too much because my net connection i...
wow, different trees!
No, headsets provide a benefit worth the annoyance. Not that I wear one anyway :/ I see what you mean though, but 3d glasses really is just too much for a gimmick. Headsets enhanced a proven and loved technology... audio.
I completely agree.
Don't worry though, 3D won't become popular - if it does I will lose all faith in this planet lol.
Who wants to wear annoying 3d glasses just to watch some pretentious rubbish 3D stuff, let alone spend lots of money on it - also 3d viewing depends where you are sitting; you have to be careful with your distance and angle: meaning a few people sitting infront of a TV can't view it optimally together (works less badly on massive screens due to size/...
true, except 3d is just stupid. It wont properly take off.
Also it annoys me when technology moves on for the benifit of those massive corporations and means we miss out. Think of all the brilliant games that would have been released if console generations changed less often - its not like developers would just stop making games due to limited graphics etc. If 90% of films became 3d in the future - who would strive to make excellent productions in 2d if there is no money in it? P...
I get what you are saying, but at least read the article!
3d is indeed a waste of time, it can be ok in some circumstances. But for the most part 2d images are much better. The price given was for the glasses - not the disks.
BRs are best used for hd films with multiple optional audio tracks (cant fit as many languages on a dvd). Meaning only 1 release, as it is region free (perhaps cencored manufacture runs though). Also good for large proportions of TV series' - ag...
$100 would be very cheap for 3d glasses :S probably with an input lag or something stupid, or distrupting the quality in terms of colour - also you need a very high quality tv or monitor to get the best from it. Optimally a 120Hz non-tn panel, or an oled tv. Fair enough oled tvs are well priced considering, but that still means buying a new tv earlier than people want if they feel the need for 3d.
people should stick to 2d. the only reason they are pushing 3d is to extend the blu...
well in that case people would be offended that the content should have been in the game to start with, or that they could have spent more time on it - so it would be seen as a money grabbing attempt: which of course it was on the part of MS. However rockstart spent time making the dlc very good - an unusual thing for dlc... which meant less money for MS. yay!
your point is correct entirely for what matters, the reason i didnt get the dls is because it was too late - i couldnt be...
the windows version is a fail port anyway :D
cant wait to get my 380GTX (or whatever they will call it) so I can play at an actual frame rate.
lol ^_^
lemme see the 360 games ive had... bioshock, halo 3, cod4, mass effect, odst, call of juarez, ninja gaiden 2, gta4, fable 2, lost odyssey... almost correct lol. if i had a ps3 i would have er... mgs4 and gta4 (i rarely buy dlc) - sorry its true, theres nothing wrong with the console its just that bioshock was on xbox first, all my cod4 friends palyed on the xbox, xbox has halo games and lost odyssey (aka final fantasy 13), fable 2 was bad... ninja gaiden 2 was good but mr...
"DRUNKEN women..."
This has nothing to do with computer games.