I was thinking it might be Clayface. He fell in the Lazarus Pit, which has unknown abilities outside of immortality. Maybe it transmits the knowledge Ras Al Ghul had? It would explain why Knight is so much more formidable in CQC than Batman is. Then, when Batman finally gets the upper hand, there's a whole other chapter or two dedicated to Batman figuring out how to stop a nearly god-like Clayface.
I would have rather had Hush instead of Penguin, though.
Who else were you looking for?
Superman is pretty much undefeatable and OP. I don't think anyone will be able to successfully make an Superman game with a good sense of progression and have it make sense. I would like to see them take the Spiderman license off Beenox's hands, though; they're clearly bored with the franchise and I'd love to see Rocksteady spin it into a more mature tale like they did with Batman.
Scarecrow will likely use Batman's memory of the Joker against him, but that will be it. Then there's Harley Quinn who likely, after Joker died, began learning how to be like her lost love to become more formidable.
There's also Clayface falling into the Lazarus Pit. I'm really hoping he has something to do with the story as a primary antagonist. I don't particularly care if Arkham Knight is a new character altogether; I would find it interesting if it wen...
Nope, the Joker is dead. He's got no part in Arkham Knight.
Wouldn't that mean it is plainly an average game if you couldn't tell if it was good or bad?
The amusing thing was he actually held a potato salad party for anyone that donated that wanted to show up and many did. Kind of cool, actually.
The original names of the two were Famine and Pestilence. Fury and Strife were made up by Nordic, I don't know why they opted to do that though.
I think people got hung up on Bungie saying they would support the game for 10 years, so they may be getting annoyed by getting bored in 6 months. Which is also understandable considering how they marketted it as having a deep lore and story with the gameplay it has. I dont think them complaining after six months due to those two things is totally unreasonable, especially since there are some single player games that I can still play and really enjoy even six to ten hears after release. I hav...
@BlackTar
Rockstar releasing GTAV for PS4/XBO is not a greedy move; it was very obvious that they were going to do that as there was code for both consoles inside the last-gen versions. Also, a lot of people were saying from the beginning that they'll either wait for it to come out on PS4/XBO or that they'd re-buy it. It isn't greed when a company does what their customers are asking for.
Also, there is no evidence that proves that they delayed Heists out ...
I think it will go back up. But it'll drop back down two weeks later with Microsoft saying again that "it isn't a price drop, it's a SALE!" as though we're dumb enough to believe that.
Because sales are high enough at that price for them to justify the current price tag. When sales decline, so will the price; supply and demand.
Does that mean that I will immediately get all the online trophies I already have? I just don't want to waste my time regaining trophies I already got.
Your online progress doesn't carry over from PS3 to PS4 in The Last of Us like it does for GTA5. There's the difference and that's why I ask.
Do the trophies/achievements carry over? If I would have to make a new character just to get the ones in multiplayer, then I see no reason to get it for me as I already have the game for PS3. And that's coming from someone who's bought The Last of Us, Tomb Raider, and Sleeping Dogs remakes.
How about no Call of Duty at all this year? Spend an extra year making a better product. But, then again, this is against Activision's short-sighted business plan.
That isn't the complaint, the complaint is the possibility that developers (and especially publishers) might see take the belief that releasing broken games is okay because "I can patch it later AND be forgiven if I promise DLC". They're complaining because they're worried this might start a trend, just like the cutting of game modes and in-game content for pre-order bonuses has become a trend.
Saw that coming. Hopefully it isn't random and is just the most recent pre-orders so it is at least fair in the sense of 'first come, first serve'.
I apologize for the misunderstanding, then. It just really grates on my nerves when some people feel that avoiding these topics when, in reality, allowing them to be brought to light in any medium can actually increase sensitivity to it in a good way. In a game, we can (for lack of a better word) 'meet' someone that had a horrible act done to them. The white phosphorus bombing in Spec Ops: The Line is a great example. Things like that, when done well, will have a similar effect to whe...
I could have sworn it was Cornholio; that's not a hood, it's his shirt! Your pic gives it away!