Gotta love that artificial scarcity.
I don't view it like that. While I don't believe it should be a requirement, I think they should have a female protagonist as the canon protagonist because it simply would be refreshing to see a story that isn't about "brown haired guy #34861". But like I said, it would be refreshing to see but I'd be more mad if they didn't make the story that they wanted to make than simply getting what's generally little more than a character model swap getting marked as t...
He's nowhere near as arrogant in real life as he appears on camera. His arrogance and narcissism are part of his online character. Most YouTube personalities claim they take their personality up to 11 on a scale of 5.
Yeah, the gameplay is great. The complaint that this game is little more than an Early Access game is very valid as well. You can have both opinions.
The game would be better if it weren't essentially an Early Access game. Just like how the world would be better if SJW's stopped whining about how boobs exist.
He used this title because he's saying that the fact that the number of people who have grown apathetic towards it combined with the number of people who buy into them (kids included) vastly outweigh those who hate the practice.
Basically, he's not wanting to admit that his two points are direct causes of microtransactions and acting as though they're separate issues when they aren't.
His two points are that the two bigger issues are that people keep buying microtransactions and while others have grown apathetic towards them. While he makes a decent argument, he misses a core issue: this it goes full circle.
Microtransactions are built to milk the consumer dry as much as possible. The games that have microtransactions implemented into them are deliberately designed to test your patience just enough to keep the microtransactions in your mind as a viable opt...
My only complaint so far is the Undertaker's biker entrance isn't usable except as an title entrance and that entrance pretty much has him rush to the ring when that's now how he was at all with it.
Or you can look it up on the fallout wiki for free. There is literally no use for the paper guides due to the internet.
Ignore Nivekki, he's just an ill-tempered pissant that thinks asking for someone's opinion on a game is akin to enslaving someone.
The first one of the reboot was good, it's definitely worth the $20 on PS4 and more than worth the $5-$10 on PS3. PS4 version plays at 60FPS/1080p. Haven't touched Rise of the Tomb Raider, though, since I'm waiting for the PS4 version. I hear it's just as good, though.
If you fail, yeah, you have to wait a bit. But if you exit instead of failing, you can start again immediately.
You can also exit out and start the terminal back up to reset the entire thing, but the password changes.
Could it be possible that it only lets you install a portion of it prior to release in an attempt to prevent legit consumers from playing it early?
And yet, most of the people in the community are pricks.
Agreed. I can play GTA5 and the world feels tiny to me. I play Skyrim and the world feels huge. I play San Andreas and it's the same thing, the world feels bigger than GTA5's world.
The definition of millennial is "a person reaching young adulthood around the year 2000." That makes most of them around 32 years old. Beyond that, though, I agree.
Question for those who have played it:
The last WWE game I played enjoyed was SvR 2009 because of the GM Mode. Played WWE12 and didn't really like the Universe mode since it felt like I had nowhere near the same degree of control as the GM Mode and I disliked the gameplay.
Is 2k16 enough of an improvement to be worth the $60 tag?
I can't help but think that this game was simply assigned to him and that maybe he isn't a big fan of FPS games in general. It's very common within the industry for a review company to go "you like platformers and only enjoy those, so go review Call of Duty!" not realizing that the reviewer will be going in already not liking the game due to not liking that genre.
I don't like how we are forced to have hydraulics when all I want are the visual modifications.
The Order had and has a ton of flaws. Every criticism I've seen against it is easily justifiable. Should that make the game any less enjoyable if you're able to look past those flaws? No, it shouldn't. But let's not pretend that the criticisms it got were unfair just because you like it because that's when you stop being a fan of the game and become yet another pretentious fanboy.