lol. lap it up. yum yum yum. whatever they spoon feed you. next thing you know they'll say its a wild success like psvr2 and the portal which have sold a tiny fraction to the compatible ps5 base (literally 0.62% as of right now in the case of the portal and 0.75% on psvr2 - which btw I own and feel totally abandoned on)
reality is, not many people wants to spend $700 on a console that is still a gen9 ps5. even if they updated it to RDNA 3, they still couldn't use ...
So basically if you want differences you can actually see, get a pc.
If this is what you get for ps5 pro, I made the right choice to skip it. The differences in graphics you get from running performance mode on ps5 or series x seems negligible if frame rate is a concern. Resolution wise is still sub native 4k and still not bringing the texture resolution and filtering of a pc
And that’s exactly why I’m not spending 700 on a ps5 pro.
700 for microscopic differences you won’t notice past 8 ft from your tv is the gist of this review.
No thx. If I was going to spend at least $700 on a console, I’d just buy a pc for bit more and get less compromises and a modular lifespan.
Ppl seem to forget that while the game sells less, the gamepass subscription sells more… and that’s kind of the goal… MS now owns COD and every gamer should know by now a big chunk of income in this day and age is service. So Xbox is making money off of PlayStation, PlayStation store, Steam, Xbox and other PC services… and then also gamepass. Hardly the L ppl want it to be. It’s just what MS wanted all along and why it said it would still publish it on PlayStation.
Bigger p...
Still current gen tho. PCs already have next gen features like path tracing that current console can't do. it's just better upscaling... not really with $700 imo.
the updated design of the playstation pro reminds me of the Nintendo PowerGlove
and almost twice the price. no thanks. after I bought the ps4 pro and the One X, I decided I wouldn't ever buy a mid console refresh again.... the gains are so minimal to your eyes in real life, no matter how the specs read - and its not a next gen machine, so its all diminishing returns. you're looking at "slightly" sharper visuals with 60 fps (most ppl don't play games 2 inches from the screen, noticing 2 sub pixels less blur than the non-enhanced version). "ray t...
Let’s see the outrage now… oh wait it’s not Xbox closing something…. Everything is fine then. Still probably Spencer’s fault, though, right?.
Too all the ppl having trouble sounding out all the words in the article, it says "ALL CONSOLES" so you can go ahead and put your Sony praise back in the drawer. It says "Xbox" cuz wait for it... its an Xbox oriented website talking about xbox specific things...
are gamers really this annoying these days? The comment sections are a laughable joke on these sites. Most people seem to have the perspective and knowledge of a 9 year old.... Not unlike Americ...
uhh if you actually put your reading glasses on instead of your fanboy glasses, it says "CONSOLES" (plural). They mention Xbox bc its... wait for it... an xbox site talking about specifically xbox...... reading is hard I guess.
The thing about this that gamers are completely naive about those contract are written years before things like layoffs happen. And despite layoffs, if the ceo is hitting all the requirements they are supposed to be hitting, they are legally in their contacts to collect money in given contract and can be sued for that money if they decide they don’t want to pay it. And that costs even more money.
Those numbers are actually factored into budgets and weigh as operating costs ...
Every time these articles get written like this, I make a comment basically saying that discs will be dead in the near future, naturally to tons of disagrees… yet here’s just more evidence. MS and Sony have just released disc-less flagship consoles… they wouldn’t be doing that if the main driver was discs based games. In this day and age, patches, updates, dlc, expansions and broadband internet have all but left discs obsolete in today’s markets. They are literally good for an initial instal...
The game wasn’t good. Period. It should have been counted as a fitness app, bc 80% of the game was just smashing buttons as fast as you could. The other 15% was walking on a rail thru a world you couldn’t actually explore, and the remaining 5% was actual fun gameplay.
The negativity you speak of that “overwhelmed the release” of the game was the simple fact that people were extremely disappointed with it. Not fun. Not engaging. Boring. Felt like a Disney attraction. It scor...
It reviewed mediocre, sold below anverage and had a low attachment rate. Why do ppl always write articles about PlayStation exclusives that were “meh” and claim they were wronged? So every person that didn’t really fall in love with this game (most people) are wrong?
I owned the game myself. It looked pretty, but it was largely boring AF. completely linear, more QTEs than actual good gameplay etc. it’s currently a 63 on MC as we speak.
Here’s a secret: ...
this makes no sense to me. the ps5 sells millions per month. the Portal sales are still less than a million total but yet they are saying thats a huge success?? by their own metric that seems pretty shitty comparatively. gotta put that Sony vibe spin on everything tho'
So is Sony’s strategy to just keep re-releasing the same games over and over? Real talk: the ps5 generation has been fairly disappointing compared to ps4 and before. Getting tired of just getting new versions of the same games, while actual good NEW games are few and far between. I can only get the excited about tlou, uncharted and hzd so many times before I just want something else to come around.
Lmao pay close to $800 (console +game) to play an uprezzed remaster of a remaster or a game that’s was rereleased. I’m good. Thx.
Personally I struggle with it. It’s not that I don’t think it’s a good game, but it feels a little corny at times and I still struggle with robot animals looking too similar to their real animal counterparts. I don’t think a sophisticated ai would do that. I think it would make the most efficient, capable machines possible, in whatever form that comes in - even if it started with earth creatures as a base. You’re not bound by biology at that point and an ai would know that (for those that car...