It looks good. Very good. Personally, I'd prefer it if it were truer to Toriyama's art, but this is fine, too.
Here's hoping they actually remember to make the animations look as nice. It was silly in RB and RB2 to have hair that would just wobble slightly instead of actually moving. Goku looked silly flying around without his hair moving in the wind.
I also hope we have more than one Goku model. The one in the screenshots is too muscled. Too much...
I agree. Vesperia was good enough, but I'd rather see something new.
Here's hoping it's Q1.
So soon? I can't wait.
With Ace Combat on PS3, all I have to do is finish Lost Odyssey and Vesperia before I can sell my 360.
When did Capcom become plural?
BREAKING NEWS EVERYBODY!
There might be breaking news to report in several hours!
Corporate espionage IS very common, and most of the time it DOES go unnoticed. And unpunished.
That said, it's pointless to blame anyone without evidence. Saying "microsoft done it" is as hairbrained and stupid as any of the conspiracy theories about Bin Laden still being alive. H.W.Bush being the /real/ mastermind of 9/11, or JFK being killed by the CIA.
Ah. A most brilliant strategy: the servers can never be hacked, so long as they are always offline.
Gameplay is good. Presentation is stellar.
The music is predictably awful (and worse for the NA/EU release, with the inevitable cuts) and the maps are the absolute WORST POSSIBLE maps of any Musou title, past or future.
And the storyline is, once again, awful.
Wish we could get another decent PS3 gundam title. Hard to be satisfied with just Senki.
They gave up on the whole "simultaneous release" idea.
If we're lucky--very, very lucky--we'll see an NA release in late Autumn 2011. As in November or December. Most likely, Q1 2012.
On the same day as Mass Effect 3. And... I don't know, Dragon Age 3? And... Halo 4 and Starcraft 2.2 and a half-dozen other big titles, causing sales to be poor, and NB to once again complain that the sole reason why their games don't sell well is beca...
Depends. Most people (including whoever wrote this "article") don't seem to know what "lolita" means. The girl in the book, IIRC, was about 14, and the term is generally accepted to refer to ephebes, so roughly ages 14-16.
Basically, the period between start and end of puberty. Most of the characters in the article do NOT fit that criteria, so whether or not Lara Croft does depends on her age.
I doubt it, as I have a hard time imaginin...
Seconded. The greatest tragedy of this console generation is the fact that the Playstation 3's best new IP only ever got (medicore) handheld sequels.
Is tonight a deadline?
I hope it does go up. There's some stuff I want to buy from the PSN store. I won't mind waiting a bit longer, but it's lasted long enough.
Not only do I still enjoy the single player side of things, I find myself liking multiplayer less and less with each new game.
...I'd rather buy a tablet.
Jon Irenicus where?
Marcello where?
And here I thought most gamers capable of articulating their opinions held Oblivion in fairly low regard.
If you want to try and come up with a list of games that 360 gamers are so busy playing, maybe you ought to try mentioning some 360-exclusives?
Just a thought.
No one ever forgot Fallout.
Want some forgotten games? How about the Tsar series? Awesome AoE clones. Or the Descent games? (Or, hell, Freespace and Freespace 2).
Or Steambot Chronicles or Arc the Lad or Legacy of Kain? These are forgotten names. One of the biggest RPG franchises that is STILL seeing releases cannot--CANNOT--be "forgotten."
Because a console that charges outrageous fees for everything (everything) and hasn't had a good game in months (and has no good upcoming games) is clearly the better choice than a temparary outage in online services for a console that's had a steady stream of great games and a great future line-up of titles.
I get that the PSN outage sucks, but I still haven't turned on my 360 at all this year. There's a reason why no one talks about the 360 any more (or the ...
They've been saying "soon" for weeks.
Honestly, I don't care how long it takes for the PSN to get back online--the only reason I want it is to BUY more stuff from Sony, so it's their loss--but, really, they'd be much better served to give us a specific timetable.
If Sony thinks they can get the PSN online in 3 weeks time, they should tell us "Two Months." That way, even after they're inevitably unable to meat their &quo...