You won't have to pay for it because it's free because of the launch issues and feminist whore remark you idiots. So your self-righteous little tirade is a wasted effort.
It's free as an apology for launch issues you fucking idiots.
Love the poster suggestion. Something that really captured the spirit of borderlands would be cool.
And a map poster would be nice. I consider map posters essential for open world CE's. I hate it when they aren't included (I'm looking at you New Vegas you sonnofa bitch).
Best portrayal of women in a video game goes to valve in my opinion. In fact they have such a good portrayal that 9 times out of 10 people forget to mention valve in the usual "women in games" debate because Alyx Vance is usually just seen as a "character" as opposed to a "female character".
Which is pretty much the perfect portrayal of a female character when you think about it.
...admittedly the nude mods did kind of piss all ...
I'd have a couple of select words aimed at the sort of people who are so eager for more call of duty they're trolling for websites about a sequel before this ones even out.
Firstly it counts as libel but most importantly they were promoting another persons video game. Pepsi can't go out and register coca-cola.com and have it filled with reasons why coca-cola gives you cancer before redirecting you to a website about how awesome pepsi is.
It's one thing to go out and slander a product but it's something else entirely to promote one of their competitors simultaneously. Whether or not the owners were sponsored by EA is debatable, but t...
They tried to include a level where you kill Rupert Murdoch but technically id software beat them to it with Doom.
Haha, looks awesome. I hope my current save is compatible with the update. I'd be heart broken if I had to completely redo my world.
Why are people talking about a game that holds 81% on metacritic like it's a failed spectacle of a game?
It's a diamond in the rough but it's still a diamond. I don't think people should be talking about what "went wrong" with a game that's got 81% on metacritic. If it had 6/10's I'd understand but it's not. Every review I've read is between 7 and 9 out of 10 and I've seen ONE review drop below six and it was clearly by someon...
I see what you're trying to do there but it doesn't change the fact these people are idiots. The fact they enjoy Call of Duty in this fashion, and are prepared to spend so much money on a four hour long game that has long since abandoned any pretense of artistic integrity in lieu of nothing but the most shameless and stomach churning corporate greed can do nothing but qualify them as stupider than spit.
Maybe it's just me but I have NEVER met someone who's a ...
You're right. That way when the PSN goes down hackers from all over the world can enjoy your save games... and credit card details.
Not really. The whole point of what I'm saying is that in all forms of art there are subsections devoted to small minorities. Whether it's comics about rape, books promoting racism, or bands that scream about the motherland. They're all there and we accept them as not just a side effect or even a symptom but as a feature of free speech. It's in everything you see but games aren't afforded that privilege. If somebody makes a game about dodgy content everyone goes nuts - inc...
Getting this out of the way - yeah we all know it's a hoax and it's a good thing blah blah blah.
But I just want to ask why is it okay for movies to be exploitative but not games? Movies have all sorts of racist KKK produced pieces of crap but if a game even tried that sort of thing it'd be nailed into the ground. I spit on your grave is basically rape porn, and so is a serbian film, but when a game goes after rape not only does the media, but even other gamers, ...
Admittedly it's not perfect but if I'm playing sp I should be given the choice to reload a save instead of it immediately respawning me. It wouldn't be so bad if it didn't autosave when you get knocked down taking away any choice from the player.
What's the point of going to japan if I'm just going to be rotting in a basement for the next three years?
First of all it doesn't show contempt. They accidentally released the dev version instead of the full version on steam. That means if you bought it retail then you got a completed game. That was hardly a "Oh darn we haven't finished let's just kick it out the door". It's just a mistake.
Secondly it may have a lot of glitches but open world games aren't easy to make. Show me a glitch free open world game? Even the almight gta IV or red dead have t...
If skyrim wasn't coming out I'd be straight over there doing my part for the japanese population by banging the living shit out of the fairer half of Japan. But when forced to choose between an island filled with hot asian poontang or skyrim... well skyrim wins.
Reddeaddestroyer, if I was you I wouldn't go leaving any sensitive information on your answering machine from now onwards.
The fourth fable in the franchise will feature full blown human level artificial intelligence and an atom by atom rendition of the physical world that supports both voxels and polygons whilst simultaneously running at 60 fps on a pocket watch. It will feature photo-realistic graphics and a crafting system that is being borrowed by NASA for simulations of upcoming engine and aircraft designs.
In all seriousness though fable:LC was a pretty awesome game and I enjoyed it. I felt...
There's a few cash exploits you can get as well if you want. The game's world isn't perfectly crafted or balanced. In fact there's a few gaping issues like respawning items and fast travel that allow you to exploit the living shit out of a lot of items and the ongoing quests they might be involved with.
But saying that if I wanted to cheat I'd get a trainer or not have allowed steam to patch the dev version (noclip? yes please) but honestly I'm happy ...