The devs did consent. They're adding this to their games.
I mean, maybe you could be right that the 4 trillion dollar company is forcing devs to comply, but then you'd need to explain why they can't get the smaller companies to comply?
I agree that this is a "hallucination" and not genuine RT or PTL.
I don't agree because you said it's blurry, fuzzy, and "AI slop." Try being less biased.
All DLSS is effectively "AI slop," but it's the best AA on PC right now.
You're not Grace is clearly the best example but that short clip everyone is using is precisely because Grace looks good and everyone is going to tell you to hate it.
But will Grace or any other DLSS 5 enhanced character turn out that well? Probably not. What people here forget is that the faces changes are built on what the AI knows about lighting not about faces. The faces look different, but the same because they're being relit.
DLSS 5 as DF said (which ...
TAA is implemented by the developers...
So, I'm failing to see your point.
Is there any PC game with mandatory DLSS? I mean on console I think there are several DLSS (Switch 2) or PSSR (PS5 Pro) games with no options but I can't think of a single PC game that makes AI upscaling mandatory, and no, TAA does not count.
Apparently, that means everyone!
So much for the "PC Master Race," am I right?
Oh, of course, somehow I'm still wrong.
This runs locally on your machine.
No RAM died for this.
This runs locally on your machine.
No RAM died for this.
[Edit: comma removed]
A real paradox of diversity.
I remember the Mario typing game and Zelda was on the CD-i.
Nintendo made its mark in gaming as a 3rd party publisher, which was way before the typing game and atrocious Phillips CD-i curfuffle. So, we can't explain why Nintendo dabbled in third parties again in the 90s.
PlayStation also dabbled as a 3rd party publisher on PC and console in the 90s and they're doing it again again with PC and on console with Xbox instead of Nintendo this time but they haven...
Must be why I can watch the Mario movie on my PS5, right?
Not just PS2 explain PS4 and even PS1. There was no real challenge in the gaming market for PS since it's inaugural console released. PS3 still well outsold Xbox 360 despite how many of us know someone who owned many due to the RRoD. I know a person who's parents bought three because the first two failed, back in the day.
Nintendo isn't doing as hot as they wanted too either, but they're in way better shape than Xbox and are already lower the absurd prices on the console, which should've never been $450 to start with. $399 was the max. I really think it should be $349 that sounds far for what Switch 2 is. Unless Nvidia is gouging Nintendo, but if that's the case, Nintendo should've known better when everyone shifted away from licensing Nvidia's HW decades ago. Either way, I'm not w...
@S2Kollinit
Thankfully, every other publisher sees how stupid the moves MS is making are. The only way Xbox and MS can continue to be that cancer on this industry is if MS makes good on that "speculation" (which came up during the ABK acquisition) and does a hostile takeover of PS and Nintendo by buying controlling stock shares in the other publishers. Nintendo's stupid moves may be putting them in a position to be purchased by MS in the next decade.
@Wilgizad
Played this on Xbox 360 as the anniversary edition during the PSN oytage. Wasn't awed by it then, why would I buy it again, now?
Xbox putting it's games on PS and everywhere else was a mistake and before they managed that many of my old Xbox die-hard friends made the leap to PS with the launch of Xbox One. The last hangers on needed to jump ship this generation and Xbox is pushing you to, but you'd rather sink with Xbox.
Wel...
Hard disagree on "almost." This is clearly deliberate.
I also disagree strongly with the reasoning as there is no way that the suits are so stupid that they can't see how increasing prices on HW and services that already so few want that it's not going to continue to sell.
I imagine after all this autumn's fumbles from MS that Xbox's userbase has dwindled to as small as one-fifth of its size globally. There's no way the suits...
It's just one of nature's many great mysteries.
Because porting a game and making a new game, totally requires the same amount of time budget and expertise... right?
PS4 also had no competition for the first 3 years. Of course Switch was only competitive sales wise not power wise so PS4 wound up getting games that Switch simply couldn't handle adequately (given the sales numbers of 3rd party games that did make the jump).
You forgot when the Democrats blamed videogames in 2012.
Some AI slop is more advanced than others.