I wasn't aware that this was a thing. I guess it's just as well though as it sounds like I should avoid it like COVID.
Lulz.
Indeed, I think the devs behind a lot of JRPG series would kill for their IP to be as popular as DQ is in the West. So what if it's not as popular as FF? Also, I'm pretty sure SE is laughing all the way to the bank as they own them both.
If you have to ask you must not have gotten the memo that Stadia is a dumpster fire.
Or perhaps the mistake was not releasing a better game.
They need a Super Lucky's Tale 2 and 3, and then a Super Lucky's World. Maybe Super Lucky's Tale 2 could actually be a repurposed game from Japan...ok, maybe not that since modern gamers would see through that. That's on a list of things that companies could only get away with in the pre-internet days. I'm guessing a Super Lucky's Tale 64 would be out, unless one actually is developed for the N64 (which can happen, but is very, very unlikely). I suppose such a name...
I see. I was thinking, they wasted no time releasing it. But I'm more interested in getting all three at once, so I'll wait for that.
I didn't even know there was a Maple Story 2. I knew there was a first game, because some years back there were non-stop Engrishy ads promoting it on a ton of sites, saying things like "Nothing can stop you...to play this game 24/7!" I never played it though, so I guess I'll never know if it was that good. Perhaps it was better than the English of whoever came up with those ads, but that wouldn't be saying a lot.
Actually, while I don't do it very often, being end-of-gen late to pick up a system isn't the end of the world. In fact, one huge benefit is that it will have a full library of games to check out, many of which are either on sale or permanently dropped in price. Contrast that with a brand new console that may have a handful of games, which are generally full-priced for the first little while, and you will have to wait for more games to come out for it.
Sure, a new...
I never had any doubt. Some people are just impatient, but I have no doubt that Sony has games to show us when they’re good and ready. They never launch a new system without any exclusives.
While some people do go full retard in response to political tripe like this in the current day and age, explain to me who here has done that? There are comments here pointing out that this article is trash, which I agree is true. No one has dignified it with much beyond that, and I sure as heck don't plan to either. Maybe you're the one who needs to lighten up.
So, this is basically an article about what offended the author? Ok then. Thanks for wasting my time.
I prefer black from an aesthetic standpoint, but I've never stained a while controller, and I can live with white if it's the only option.
Neat. I'm looking forward to it.
I'm perfectly cool with them creating new Pokemon. What's less cool, at least to me, is there seems to be a periodic quota of new Pokemon as new "gens" are scheduled at regular intervals that seem to get more and more frequent as time goes on. Creative burnout was probably inevitable. There are some modern ones I really like, but others clearly exist because they need to fill up slots, such as three samey-looking monkeys of three different elements, or a literal set of ke...
On the XSX, maybe, as they're insisting that all Xbox exclusives be cross-gen for a while. Cross-gen titles were a thing at the start of this gen too, mind you. The only thing that's really new about it is that there will be no XSX exclusives to really take advantage of the hardware. There will be PS5 exclusives though, you can count on that.
How is Sony throwing away 110 million console owners? The PS4 will still be receiving support for a while, because Sony never abandons their previous systems right away. They may cease producing exclusives for it (we will see), but they will still support the system. Also, who's to say none of those 110 million users will buy a PS5? That's a blatant falsehood, because I'm getting one.
I think we may hit a temporary wall. The real wall will be when games look like real life, but I think there will be a lot of hurdles to overcome before we get there.
Assuming you don't die horribly or suffer to some extent due to how dangerous many of the creatures in that world are, yes. Of course, you're culturally encouraged to be obsessed with zoology and likely seek some kind of career in that field if you don't achieve the highest honor of getting your revenue from battling. Failing that, you might employ an animal to assist you so you don't look completely out of sync with the local culture. Not to mention, when you're 10 or ...
If they're serious, someone needs to inform them about what fiction is. Actually, Animal Crossing has to be the kindest portrayal of catching creatures, since they survive regardless of what you do.