True, but it did run better on the 360.
PS3 is my preferred console, but it still isn't a fact. People need to learn the difference.
Unicron's statement is an opinion too, but if you look at it another way it is a fact that all consoles are great for somebody out there.
I can give you a list of reasons why I prefer the PS3, but those would be my reasons, not yours. Everybody is entitled to their own opinions about things like this, even if you don't agree or understand with that opini...
What about Uncharted, Uncharted 2, God of War 3, Killzone 2 and The Last Guardian?
That's why I have always supported Playstation consoles. I have also supported other consoles and try not to be fanboyish about things, but I really do appreciate the way Sony takes risks on new IPs that other publishers wouldn't give the light of day.
That's what I was thinking. The biggest difference I see is that Dead Rising had more of a realistic look, while Dead Rising 2 has a more stylized or cartoony look to it.
It would have caused the cost of the system to increase. Remember how much trouble Sony had selling the PS3 when it cost $500 or $600? The console makers can't just throw everything into their consoles. They always have to strike a balance.
I like my PS3 more than my 360, but I still think PS3 fanboys troll more. I don't know, that's just what I see.
LOL that was funny. I agree with all the rest of what you wrote.
Good sarcasm on the first part. +1
The graphics are stunning. Thankfully it seems the gameplay lives up to the same lofty standards.
Looks awesome. Halo Reach is going to epic.
I agree with big_silky's comment below, the two games appeal to different tastes. Personally, Enslaved looks like a fresh experience. We don't get enough action adventure games and this one looks great. Enslaved has great graphics, a strong narrative, fantastic character models, and a nice variety of action gameplay and platforming. I'm getting it for sure.
I know, since they have the same graphical style and approach we should just be able to do a direct comparison. /s
Why do some people even think you can compare exclusives? There is no way to prove which one looks better, it's all opinion.
That was a very poor comparison. They should have at least showed the Halo 2 video at full size so that you could see how poor its textures and effects are compared to Halo Reach. Showing a little thumb nail actually makes the older game look better than it actually is.
Halo Reach is going to be one of the most amazing games of the year, but this article had too much exaggeration.
Nobody should like this. It is bad for the industry, just like when the Xbox 360 was hacked. No matter which console you prefer nobody should be happy about piracy.
Sadly they are not identical from what I have seen. I am tired of developers lying to us.
The fact is, grammatically a company can be referred to in the singular or the plural depending on whether the speaker is thinking of the company as a single entity or as collection of individuals.
At least we don't have to wait until next September like we do for Rage.
Disc swapping is ~slightly~ annoying and so if both versions are pretty close I will definitely get the PS3 version. Well actually mandatory installations are also annoying so I will also have to wait and see if the PS3 version has a mandatory installation.
The game itself looks outstanding. It is by far one of the best looking and exciting multi-platform games on the horizon.