Can't wait to play both of these on my PS4 and PC.
I can honestly only barely see the difference between 30 fps and 60 fps gameplay. If sacrificing that tiny improvement means getting things like dynamic lighting, real tree models, customizeable day/night cycles, or weather then I'm all in.
I love my ps4 but it's times like this when I'm glad I have a PC.
I'm getting both. And I'm going to get Grid Autosport for PC, and then Gran Turismo 7.
Because I love cars.
I wasn't aware DLCs counted as yearly installments now.
@marloc_x By your logic, gaming PCs would easily be able to handle a PS3 emulator. Yet despite being jailbroken for years now, there are none.
@Dmagic You've completely missed my point. My point isn't about the quality or features of the game, its about the entire concept of a "new IP." You don't just take the same formula, add some features and parade it around like a "new IP," a new IP is something that was designed from the ground up to be something different. You could very loosely argue that a third person CoD would have been like a "new IP."
@psyxon My favorite part ab...
I don't think I saw a single video game actually being played.
This isn't how you treat a game as a "new IP."
Starcraft Ghost is treating a game like a "new IP." Paper Mario is treating a game like a "new IP." Metal Gear Rising is treating a game like a "new IP."
This is Black Ops 2 with some Crysis mechanics. It doesn't even resemble a new IP.
I don't think anything can be predicted until we see E3. A $400 Kinect-less Xbox won't determine the fate of Xbox until we know what games will be on both systems. Why do I know this? Because $400 got you a Xbox One with Kinect AND Titanfall, and it still lost to the PS4 in NPD.
The handheld market's biggest audience are commuter counties like Japan and Europe. You know, the audience that doesn't buy Xbox products.
@Eonjay I wouldn't blame Iron Galaxy for this. They're a small indie dev who was tasked with porting a AAA title from a home console to a handheld.
I really don't understand why this is so difficult to comprehend. If Nintendo made a game where I was only allowed to have same-sex marriages, I'd be infuriated.
@Omegasyde
Homosexuality is not being stuffed down your throat. Heterosexuality is being stuffed down homosexual's throats. It not about forcing Nintendo to include gay characters, it's about not restricting players from being gay. It's more a matter of freedom rather than equality.
You know what else isn't natural? Air conditioning. Cars. Pharmaceuticals. Video games.
When people are discussing things like toxic waste, climate change, or natural energy you call us hippies. When the discussion goes to gays, suddenly you're all about nature and preservation. What?
I'll try to turn the table in hopes of making people at least try to understand.
Imagine if in Dragon Age, you were only allowed to romance male characters if you were a male character and female characters if you were a female. Imagine if same-sex relationships were your only choice and you were never given the option for heterosexual relationships.
Kind of a bummer right? I'm not objectively saying Nintendo should go in and change their game, but I ...
I still don't see why they can't give us the option of turning off the lightbar. I look forward to VR, I really do, but until then the lightbar is doing nothing but being distracting and sucking up battery.
It's not a huge deal, just would've been nice to have an option.
As much as I would really love the PS Vita to be selling "like hotcakes", I'm pretty sure the reality is that the retailers didn't order a lot of stock to begin with. In any case, I'm glad consumer demand exceeded expectations.
Nintendo doesn't set money on fire just because they "have" it. They took a big bet selling the 3DS at a loss and they didn't want to do it again with the Wii U. Now the Wii U is drowning.
I don't know why anyone would look at a half billion loss as anything other than concerning but I'll tell you this. If you really love Nintendo, like I do, you should be concerned.
@Iceball2000 That's like asking why do you want to see the pores on a person's face or the cuts and scratches on a piece of armor. Because it's realistic.