And now we have people hyping up the God of War 3 graphics in the article about the new trailer. It looks good, but not nearly as good as some of those guys are making it out to be. Many of the textures are low resolution and while it has huge boss battles people seem to forget how huge some of the boss battles were on the PS2. From a technical perspective it is well above average, but it is not raising any bars.
Alan Wake looks substantially more realistic.
This is amazing. The realism and detail of those graphics is mindblowing. I've watched the trailer about 9 times now and the graphics still leave me with my jaw on the floor.
Get real. Alan Wake looks better than this game without question. You fanboys are overhyping yet another PS3 game.
Look at the textures in GOW3 http://ps3.ign.com/dor/obje... they are blurry and low resolution.
To me GOW3 looks like GOW2 http://ww...
Alan Wake looks better than this.
http://screenshots.teamxbox...
http://ps3.ign.com/dor/obje...
The Alan Wake trailer was more impressive to me. That looked almost photo realistic. This looks like a colorful game with great scale and huge boss battles, but it doesn't look as realistic or impressive to me.
You honestly think God of War 3 looks better than Uncharted 2? I find that incredible. Really take a look at the screenshots of both games and try to tell me God of War 3 looks as good as Uncharted 2.
Uncharted 2: http://www.shacknews.com/sc...
God of War 3:
Nah, it's just you. Well, you and a few other PS3 fanboys.
Blah blah blah... Sony talks just as much about the competition. Open your eyes. Did you read that last interview with Peter Dille in which he was talking about how he believes they will surpass the 360? You know, the one where he said this: "They had an opportunity to sprint as far ahead of us as possible when they had the head start. Well, we're breathing down their necks and they can see us in the rearview mirror and it's not going to take too long to pass them".
@ 1.1
Yeah, because we all know that more players equals a better game. /s
Why should developers do it just to prove something? If it doesn't result in a more enjoyable game, why do it?
There are PC games that network thousands of players together on the same server, but that doesn't automatically make them more enjoyable games.
Ah ha ha ha ha! You're too funny.
No, MAG is pretty mediocre, that's why I don't care about it. I played the beta and it felt generic and boring.
Get your facts straight. Frontlines: Fuel of War on the Xbox 360 supported up to 50 players.
However, having more players does not make a game better. MAG and Fronlines Fuel of War have tons of players, but they aren't even as good as many other online shooters with fewer players.
In my opinion, between 10 and 32 total players is about optimal.
Then what does that say about the far greater number of ps3 fanboys trolling in articles about 360 games? I guess ps3 fanboys want 360 games even more than 360 fanboys want ps3 games.
I have a ps3 and I couldn't care less about MAG. I tried it and didn't like it.
Yeah, the rain and mist should make for some moody environments. I am looking forward to what they will show.
Awesome news. I can't wait to see what they show.
And Demon's Souls, FFXIII Versus and Agent will be coming to the 360.
@pixelsword
Your comment is the moronic one. You are trying to change the use of a term that has always been used in the gaming world. Every magazine and game site in the world uses the term console exclusive. The ONLY people I have ever seen complain about the term are ps3 fanboys, and it's obvious why they do it.
The word "exclusive" does not have anything to do with only being available in one place. It depends on the context. It simply means that it is ...
Sure, fanboy, keep telling yourself that. Alan Wake on the 360 runs at 720p and looks better than anything on the PS3. And there was gameplay in the trailer. The GOW3 trailer had only a little bit of gameplay too, but of course you would never complain about that because you are a hypocrite.