Better quality one
http://imageshack.us/a/img4...
They don't look that bad for running a open world game 7 years after they were introduced.
I would be skeptical too if it wasn't R* North that was making it. I'm sure they know what they are doing...
Well this looks legit. Oh black/hispanic guy too?We are going to have two protagonists? Dogs?? Oh my... Would be great! One older and one younger, like Walt and Jessie...
BTW, that new artwork looks fucking boss. R* North artists, talented as f***.
Just PS360? Why Rockstar Why? :(
What.The.Fuck. 18 pages??? Holy mother...
I read that, its just that thats no excuse. If one has mandatory install and on the other you dont install it when majority that are looking at comparisons have HDD, than thats poor job. Its like taking PC screenshots in low settings because some people have weak PCs. Idiotic excuse.
They could at least install higher res textures on hard drive. Its like ~3 minute of work...
Why are they showing 360 version?
PS4 will be released next year and shown before E3 just like Next Box. Count on that.
This is not official site. Again, fucking TRANSLATE articles about "official GTA stuff" and again, NOTHING.
It does take alot to get something like snow deforming work when you are making open world game with dynamic time of day and weather system and where every kb matters. Whenever snow deforms it takes bit of processing time to deform mesh and than some memory to stay that way, its not easy as you think.
Well entire game has black bars on top and bottom, so they render it at 1280x576 but instead of upscaling they just cut the bottom and top (like BF3 has done, only much more) so they don't lose sharpness.
Well, Cage still had to lower resolution of Beyond to get those good looking faces in real time. And its not like that game is open world or something, its very tightly scripted game, yet they still had to lower resolution.
It probably is. Every AC ran a bit wonky, and this one is the biggest and best looking of them. When you have alot of trees and all of them casting shadows, frame rate will suffer, you will see.
Wow this game is going to be a frame rate choke on consoles. Just look at fps that is shown in the last part. "23-26fps" Wow...
Agreed, only they will most likely use DDR4. It will be standard by 2015, and it will be cheaper than DDR3. Its also faster and has less powerdraw.
You cant innovate when you have strict 2 year dev cycle and biggest evil in gaming industry breathing down you neck.
Treyarch get alot of shit thrown at them, but they are good developers IMO. People expect to much of them when they have 2 year dev cycle and they have to deliver game on couple systems all at 60fps. Not to mention making IW's Wii ports...Just having DX11 stuff in such short cycle is great thing.
The biggest grip that reviews seem to have with Halo 4 is that its "same ol same". Same formula with better graphics. Now, 343i was obviously in delicate position. They couldn't radically change it, because backlash would be terrible, yet the game wasn't supposed to be the same as other Halos. I haven't played it, but I expect it to be AAA experience all around, and for people that are tired of Halo formula I'm sure will be lower than that. Next time, I'm sure 34...