CRank: 5Score: 39750

Yes, Microsoft would. This is Twitter. This ain't courts.

He literally started with "I hear".

1145d ago 12 agree0 disagreeView comment

Whether or not talent left Rare... Microsoft owns these IPs and they have done nothing with them.

1148d ago 6 agree2 disagreeView comment

A lot of people may not like it...

But the fact that it is successful ... means the fans like it.

1149d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Nah, they just go 1000% on buying IP. Great for the industry.

1151d ago 5 agree0 disagreeView comment

None of what I said is "feelings", they are all facts. It all matters.

Part of the argument for Microsoft getting Activision is the mismanagement at Activision.

.
Riigght...because Microsoft knows how to manage gaming studios well. These layoffs are just more arguments against it.

1152d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Because the Activision and Bethesda purchases do indeed matter.

They claim these purchases are for the good of the industry. They claim it is good for gamers. They say it isn't anticompetitive.

But with Bethesda so far... what have they done that is good for anyone? Nothing. Have they done anything anticompetitive? Yes, they've already pulled games from Sony.

Fired a bunch of people. Nothing to show for games.
...

1152d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

I agree that I wish both would stop doing it. But still comparing buying an exclusive or a timed exclusive to buying THE BIGGEST publisher... makes no sense. One is magnitudes worse.

1157d ago 11 agree4 disagreeView comment

I mean he is devious, but obviously neither the player or the main characters were fooled, other than a young child.

1158d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Is this site going to turn 1 Variety list into 10 different articles? There are many more gaming people on that list.

1169d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Quite a bold statement for a game we've seen hardly anything from.

1173d ago 21 agree5 disagreeView comment

Remember how many times you kept saying that MS wasn't making any Bethesda games exclusive or taking them from PS?

You going to keepp denying that even still even though it was clear already?

1181d ago 17 agree6 disagreeView comment

What benefit to consumers?

1181d ago 14 agree4 disagreeView comment

Right you're now say publishers are the same as studios.

Even if it was that simple... you're still suggesting that buying Bungie, who literally has 1 franchise, 2 games in total is comparable to around 50 franchises and hundreds and hundreds of games.

The comparison ends because they magnitude of difference is off the charts.

1183d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Yes, they honored only what they were forced to honor. Does nothing to counter my point.

1183d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

Please stop comparing buying a studio to buying gigantic publishers.

1183d ago 3 agree3 disagreeView comment

Microsoft told the same thing to the EU about Bethesda games. It didn't make sense financially to pull games from other consoles they said. It wasn't viable.

Guess what they did?

You been living under a rock?

Microsoft bought one of the biggest publishers. They lied in defense of the deal. Now they're trying to buy the biggest one.

1183d ago 13 agree6 disagreeView comment

I don't have anything against adding an ad-based version for a cheaper offering. But as others have pointed out, this is likely going to mean an increase in price for the non-ad version. Microsoft has already admitted they will have to raise prices.

1184d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

When studios put resources into this, that means they are not putting resources into new games that they could be.

So yes, it does affect others.

Twilight Princess has already been released on 3 generations of Nintendo consoles. Enough is enough. If you want to play it, buy one of those consoles or emulate it.

1185d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Because I'd rather play new games instead of playing a port (it isn't a remaster or remake) that is virtually the same as the old one.

1185d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Youre only providing evidence for my claims.

1185d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment