lol. RPG's just aren't my thing, but maybe I'll give it a go one day - The overwhelmingly positive stuff I hear about it must mean something!
Both look interesting. If I can afford them, I'll buy both. If not, I'll only buy INFAMOUS.
I hope you don't apply the "blockbuster" logic to movies. If so, you must like some godawful crap when it comes to films.
Probably the same sort who protest TOM & JERRY cartoons because of 'animal cruelty'.
These people would be far better employed directing their (admittedly well intentioned) ire at the real thing going on in the streets around them, not some fantasy on a tv screen.
Cliché #76 in the "Big Book of Sony Hating" gets trotted out once again I see.
A brilliant game that deserves ny accolade it can get. I'm still working on my "Stargate" themed level (starring Colonel Sack O'Neill)!!
"Joy"?? You want a product you have no interest in to fail and people to lose their jobs?
Riiiiiigghht...
The 'truth' with his own bitter, skewed slant applied. If the product he represents is so magnificent, why the need to rubbish Sony at every turn? Bit like politicians covering up their shortcomings by attacking their opposite numbers. It's feeble & transparent in politics and it's just as feeble & transparent in business.
I get pissed off by gullible people who continually support a console that lets them down with a persistant, well publicised flaw.
HOME does not 'suck'!!!
By all means I realise it may not be everyone's tastes, but it's a technically brilliant and innovative use of the PS3 and to dismiss it so casually is ludicrous.
VALKYRIE CHRONICLES isn't to my tastes, but I wouldn't dream of saying it sucked. It's just not my thing, same with some people and HOME. Why can't people make the distinction?
Personally, I've visited HOME a few times but think it needs a lot more to keep me interested, but the...
"Divvy"... haven't heard that for a while. Great word, and very applicable!
Because he's an alleged professional representing a 'respected' international company while we're just joe-public.
Ah "negative campaigning", the last resort of people with nothing good to say about themselves!
Uuughhh, "last place" whinging again. The original XBOX was 'last' after the PS2. Do you say it was crap? It was worthless? Stop being so childish and throwing numbers up as some sort of 'proof' of your own narrow views.
Short SP campaign (relatively speaking): Around 7-8 hours on standard difficulty.
Settings aren't as diverse as KZ1. Delibertaely so I might add, as Helghan is bleak and inhosbitable unlike the lush contrasts of Vekta (the jungle, snow, city parks etc. settings of KZ1)
Can't fault the online side of it though.
Indeed. My 60GB launch PS3 has been in daily use since purchase with all manner of games. "There's nowt so blind as those who won't see", as me mam used to say.
Buy a console just for KZ2???
If UNCHARTED, HEAVENLY SWORD, GT PROLOGUE, WIPEOUT HD, RESISITANCE 1 and 2 and RATCHET & CLANK (to name but a few) haven't convinced you that the PS3 is a very worthy purchase for anyone genuinely interested in games then I really don't think you ever will be.
Neco, I've been playing Resistance FOM since the release of the PS3, and bought COD4 at the same time as people who own a 360. So I've been playing shooters on my console of choice "for years" too!
And "useless hunk of plastic" from the evil clown beneath me... *sigh* Straight after saying he didn't have a PS3 too, thus rendering his statement utterly null and void.
First or third, the PS3 will still be a brilliant console that's never failed to impress me at every turn. Won't affect the great games out now and on the way.
If I can't play as VELVET SKY then I'm not interested!!!;)