If it's anything like The Shield, I'll like it.
I got my fingers crossed for the next Red Dead game. And an accompanying PC release with it too, please.
While it is a horrible port that runs like crap, it's still an excellent game I can't stop playing.
I didn't unlock the framerate, I'm happy with it running maxed out @ 1080p30fps solid because I know it can't run at 60fps whatsoever.
Just do yourself a favor, don't do a tech analysis - just play the game. You'll enjoy it.
EDIT: Plus, it's been known from the start that it's going to be a lousy port. Capco...
Who?
No Red Dead Redemption Remaster is the sadder news here.
Reason behind the disagrees?
I wouldn't call Spec Ops: The Line underrated. Although the story is superb and it differs from every other military shooter's story, the gameplay just isn't anything spectacular. It has one great aspect - the story. Everything else is mediocre.
Binary Domain is also not underrated in my opinion. This might be a personal thing, but it's not appealing in the slightest. Some people might like the B-list movie style it was going for, along with the brutally Japa...
There is no point in building a PC that can rival the PS4 or Xbox One. If that's what you want, then you might as well just get one of the consoles for gaming and a cheap as dirt PC for other tasks.
The whole point of owning a PC is getting a better deal than what you can get with consoles. For it to be a better deal, it at least has to be more powerful.
The reason why an i7 is recommended every time nowadays is simply because it has 8 threads - and that's because next-gen games are made for the 8 core console CPU.
The thing is - you don't really need an i7 in these cases. The reason for it is that the console CPU is quite weak compared to desktop PC CPUs. Most PC CPUs can brute-force the lack of cores, so you'll be fine with a modern i3.
Don't sweat the i7 recommendation people. You'll b...
Never going to happen and it's a terrible business idea.
Deep Down goes multiplatform.
Probably to point out how shallow CoD is compared to Dark Souls.
I don't even like Dark Souls, but I respect it.
Too bad there are plenty of sheep who more than make up to EA what they lost on you.
It's a sad sad society this.
A publisher who releases free downloadable content is the publisher I will support by buying their games. DLC has gotten out of hand these days. And I mean a lot.
I have tons of respect for Valve for their support on CS, L4D and every other game of theirs.
But the main story arch of previous Assassin's Creed games ended with Assassin's Creed 3. So there was no story to continue, they had to go in a slightly different direction. And they never strayed from the formula of the previous games - the Observatory replaced apples of Eden and that's about it.
So again, there is still no logic behind your statement.
So.. It's not an Assassin's Creed game because it only has the Assassin's Creed name and the Assassin's Creed gameplay? I don't get the logic behind your statement.
In all honesty I believe these guys should get the license for the next Dead Space game. Seriously.
70-100fps in an Ubisoft game my ass.
I think it's obvious considering how much of it we actually saw. Which was nothing.
Every boss in every Japanese game ever.