True, but how many Wii U games have become vaporware lately? How many developers ditched Wii U development?
Sure, Bayonetta 2 is on Wii U only, but that's a rare occurrence.
And I'm no kid.
But the developers won't bother with the WiiU when they've got the PS4 and Xbox One to work with. Heck, the 360 and PS3 are still getting games while the WiiU gets hardly any.
In other news: Water is wet!
This will be the first CoD since MW2 that I will get.
It would be one of the rare well optimized Ubisoft games if that's the case.
It was DICE who made it. DICE doesn't really care for it, though.
It will probably be the most unoptimized one as well, considering their history.
4GB VRAM a necessity. HAH!
Thanks for the answer, I just got a 360 and was wondering about getting Halo 4. It looked impressive in the video, just wanted to know if it looks like that on the old version.
You can still somehow feel how the game is running though, and this didn't feel exactly 60fps to me. Thanks for the answer.
Is Halo 4 1080p/30fps or 60fps? From the video it seems like it's 30. Also, how does it compare to the 360 version graphically? Is it just a resolution bump?
They are not pointless articles nor should they be banned.
I for one like reading tech articles. I like to understand what's going on behind the screen and I like to know tech details and limitations of hardware or software.
If these kind of articles aren't for you, move along. Not everyone uses them as fuel to the fanboy fire.
No one should be against pirating because it isn't only a means to steal. People want to be informed about what they're buying. No other way than to try it out before, especially on PC where it's a mystery how a game will run or will it run at all.
Oh yeah, completely forgot about that. It's rare I don't feel cheated even seeing some DLC, let alone buying it. Only ones I've got so far was RDR:UN and Max Payne 3 when it was on sale so I bought the complete pack.
I'm all for DLC when they stop exploiting it and overcharging it.
Nope. DLC is bad, mmmmkay? Don't do DLC, mmmmkay?
Or atleast, do DLC that is worth getting instead of say, 4 maps and 2 weapons for 15$ like in Battlefield.
In my opinion, look to Rockstar for changing the negative perception of DLC.
If this turns out to be true, it'd definitely give me a reason to play it again. I need something new added to it to make it fun again because I've finished the game so many times I could finish it with my eyes closed. Best GTA ever.
I'd get an Xbox One for that, if I wasn't poor as shit.
Maybe they'll release it on PC as well. Haha, yeah.
So it's coming to PC after all.
Had an HD7850, Mantle never really worked well with it. Had constant stutters and 1-2 second freezes. It did provide a much higher framerate than DX11 though.
I've since switched to a GTX 760. I have higher performance in DX11 with the 760 than I did with the HD7850 and Mantle. What's funny about the whole situation is the fact that I was supposedly bottlenecking the HD7850 in DX11 and there's absolutely no bottlenecking with the 760, with a much higher framerate...
I don't know why people disagree with you. Technicalities alone do not make a game beautiful, the styling does.
That's why Half Life 2 still looks good to me, why Bioshock Infinite looks absolutely fantastic.
Take a look at Batman Arkham City, for example. It's not a technical masterpiece, but it's design makes it shine.
I'd say resolution and fps are equally important.
In order to get the best picture clarity it's important to run at the maximum/native resolution of your screen, which is mostly 1920x1080. My monitor's max output is 1920x1080 and if I lower the resolution in a game to 1600x900 things start to look muddy and honestly, like crap.
In order to get the best gameplay experience, a high but most of all stable framerate is crucial.
My adv...