They said themselves that Zelda development was going better than expected and they thought about showing it at E3 2013. Get your facts straight.
Except Chris Morris Never spoke to Ubisoft before writing his article.
Chris Morris made it up, and used a rearranged completely unrelated quote from an interview in june Read the actual source article.
Its made up bs. Chris Morris IMPLIES he had an interview, actually talked to these people.
He didn't, all of his quotes, are clipped directly from other interviews, from other news sites, WITHOUT being sourced or credited, (thats plagiaris...
Mine's covered in dust, too. But only cause you don't need to move the console to use it. Even if I used it all day everyday it'd still have dust on it. Doesn't help that I'm not using it heaps, either...
Ok, you said that the Wii U doesn't stand a chance against the Xbone and PS4, and that they're not even in the same league.
That is not a fact.
Why must it be an exclusive? Project cars looks as good as forza 5.
Indeed the PS4 games are currently easier to make because the need for optimisation is not as prominent, but that will change as PCs get more powerful and the devs have to optimise for consoles. Of course, it'll get harder to make good looking Wii U games too, much harder, in fact.
It's at the end of the generation that I expect we'll see the biggest difference in graphics between the wii u and the other consoles, but for now it's fine.
8gb Wii U's weren't discontinued..
The only reason devs are already using 4gigs of ram is because they thought "oh great! We have lots of ram to work with!" and then didn't optimise their games to run well with little ram because they didn't need to. They could probably have run their games with less ram, provided they took some time to optimise their game, and still had a game that looked as good as it did.
Trust me, the Wii U will have no trouble keeping up with the Xbone and PS4 until the ...
Just because the graphics look cartoony doesn't mean they're not using much power.
"Wii U is a console for people who fear change", oh, except for the tablet controller.
Oh well, I just hope they keep the shop channel open forever and ever and ever.
He's completely correct, only thing is Sony makes better games anyway.
And I think games that don't have local multiplayer are stuck in the 90s. Mario 3D World does. Just putting it out there.
This is great! It's been annoying being unable to post with colour, or even with shades other than black and white. Man, I must have spent days checkering black and white to create grey.
There was a lot of content, but it was all really bad and was sold at a high price. This caused people to lose faith in the videogame industry and stop buying as many games and consoles. In turn, videogaming nearly died out.
All those games you were playing were probably a lot worse than you remember them being. There were very little good games coming out during that period.
Video gaming itself nearly died out. Yes, the 1983 gaming crash was bad.
Nintendo puts Mario's name on games to ensure that people pick them up.
If Nintendo comes up with this great game but doesn't put Mario's name on it then there's a higher chance it'll go unnoticed no matter how great the game is.
Some people will buy a game simply because it says Mario on the cover.
I wish Nintendo would make more new IP's, but I can also see why they stick with Mario quite often.
It'll be interesting to see if they release their next game on the Xbox One and the PS4, because I'm pretty sure they'll have a smaller install base (when the game comes out, anyway).
Love the way you start by apologising on an article about Nintendo fans being too apologetic.
But in all seriousness there's not much that Nintendo would need to apologise for, apart from the game drought that we're currently in the middle of on the Wii U.
Probably would have costed double what the PS3 costed at launch, easy, maybe more.