Zero lag is literally impossible, even just playing a normal PS3 game with a PS3 controller has lag, the TV has lag between when the console sends the image, and when the image is actually shown on the TV. That's why, on the Wii U, the image appears on the GamePad a few frames BEFORE it's on the TV.
This isn't "no lag", this is just lag small enough to be almost, if not completely, unnoticeable.
Not trolling, just correcting the article...
Like the golden SS Wii remote. Man, that thing was awesome. Still my preferred controller when playing the Wii.
The thing with the Wii U is:
Once you go Wii U, you can't go back.
Suddenly it seems so much more convenient to just not turn on the TV, or if someone's using it you don't need to bother them. I think that even if I got an Xbox One or PS4 with the same games as the Wii U with better graphics, I'd still choose the Wii U version, because of the Off-screen play. It just makes gaming so much better.
The Vita's not really competing with the Wii U.
@Cootdog123
Refer to my earlier reply to you.
Yes, things CAN save the Wii U.
@Cootdog123
Really? NOTHING can help it? Nothing at all?
What about: Mario 3DLand, Wii Fit U, Wii Party U, Mario Kart, Smash Bros., WWHD, Bayonetta 2, X, and that yarn Yoshi game?
They can't help the Wii U?
Not to mention all the 3rd parties, like COD: Ghosts, Watch_Dogs and Assassin's Creed 4.
I hope they release the proper Wii U Zelda when the Wii U accepts additional GamePads, because I need that controller and I don't want to have to buy a new console for it :/
It'll sell more than 300.
And you only need to look at one screen.
Seems legit.
Not in Australia.
He said "pretty sure", not: I am 100% sure ms would keep most of the money.
Anyway, it does seem likely that Microsoft would keep MOST of the money (most just means more than half), so the split could be 49-51, and Microsoft would still be getting most of the money.
I think with most consoles it's the same, with the actual indie dev making less than half of the profits, I might be wrong, though.
With Windows phones, an average ...
Yeah, I've got the Wii U and every game on it with online works like a charm. I don't know why the devs expect their games to sell when they're not as good as the other console's versions of the same game.
Is there something wrong with the Wii U's online? Or are the devs just lazy? It seems like every game coming to it right now is missing online.
Yeah, but the 3DS is also dominating the console market, too. It's beating the PS3 and 360, not just the VITA.
PC is good for lots of the exclusives (mmo's, F2P, etc), but consoles, for me, will always be king. Keeping up with technology is just too hard on PC, you've got to buy newer and newer parts for the newer and newer games, but on consoles you buy the system and you're set for 6, 7, 8 years.
I like the exclusives on consoles, not that the PC exclusives are bad, I love most of their exclusive games, and they're normally cheaper, too, but the feeling of playing, s...
I agree with thezeldadoth, games these days that have levels that take more than two tries seem to be dying out because of bad reviews.
What happened, game reviewers are supposed to be good at games. You simply can't take points off a game's review score because the game is hard.
All the other reviews have been very positive.
Stop trolling please.
Main series MMO? :O
That's if the game is good.
Remember, not many home console pokemon games are that good.
They still sell heaps, though, and if the game is on the same level as the handhelds then you're right, the Wii U has already won :)
Exactly, nothing at all is.
And there is no way this'll work over wifi in Australia. I can barely stream a 360p video here, let alone a stream of a game.