All Channels
Popular

orakga

Trainee
CRank: 5Score: 13530

You're right, the PS3 doesn't get as much online PLAY as the 360, but the users connect to the PSN just the same. In fact, they HAVE to connect to the PSN every month or so for the firmware updates, so measuring the number of PS3 machines that connected to PSN (even if they're not using multiplayer for it) gives a very accurate reference point for the active user base.

6506d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Just because your ex was hot, it doesn't mean you're *still* a stud. Focus on your current project Sony and stop showing off your past achievements.

6506d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

... as in people who still have their consoled plugged into their TVs and play games on them. So, by that account, the active user base for the PS2 HAS to be lower than 140 million. It's because many people who had at one point purchased PS2s now own PS3s, 360s and Wiis and don't use their PS2s anymore.

But yes, it's nearly impossible to measure that "active base" accurately (especially on a last-gen console which doesn't need an online connection like the next-gens...

6506d ago 4 agree1 disagreeView comment

Point well taken Juuken. And I would almost nit-pick a couple of points, but your basic argument is valid.

6507d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

Yes, but that also means that their hardware will retire sooner.

Or rather, that their hardware is outdated compared to some of their competition. (it's hard to make that argument with the Wii in the mix, but I hope you get my point)

6507d ago 0 agree3 disagreeView comment

God what a genius idea.

/tear

6507d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Bubbles for you Mont.
I almost missed that.

6507d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

Yes, and also because although their 1st party titles have certainly allowed them to secure a very nice position in the market, the longer-term battle relies much more on 3rd party titles.

So when there is prevalent market "speculation" that 3rd party titles don't sell well on the Wii, they need to come up with a way to make sure that the 3rd party developers' next games do not move to the PS360s.

This is an image-game. And the audience is the corporat...

6507d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

...a Wii fanboy.

Because noone could possibly be as unintelligent as he pretends to sound.

(and I love how the PS3 + 360 "fanboys" are slowly starting to coalesce; because in the end, we're all too similar in too many regards)

6507d ago 5 agree2 disagreeView comment

You're not a Zealot unless you can muster the words "MY LIFE FO AIUR B!TCHES!!"

6510d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

I totally forgot about that game... =D
Yeah that should move some units too.

Unlike Folklore, that's an authentic JRPG.

6510d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Microsoft's (IMO shady) long-term strategy seems to be working as intended.

Whoever said money can't buy you love...

6510d ago 5 agree9 disagreeView comment

The Holy Mary just bought a Wii.
Just another old lady buying into the Wii-fad.

(OOOPS I DIDNT MEAN TO BRING ON ZE NINTENDO WRATH!!!)

6510d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

They already got paid by MS and their games aren't even out yet.

6510d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I wouldn't put Capcom in the same boat as SE.

They decided in 2006 to pursue a multi-platform strategy, and after trying the 360 with Dead Rising and Lost Planet, they went all-out multi-platform. Also, they never announced "DMC is never coming to the 360", whereas SE did so with FF13. So, there's no inconsistency there. They make EVERYTHING multi-platform now.

And by that logic, if SE also began to pursue a multi-platform strategy for all their game...

6510d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I see... and who "paided" you to be older?

Nice try.

6510d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

For someone who comes out swinging at all of N4G for fanboyism, you truly have your facts messed up.

Nintendo used to put a "annual release cap" on all their developers. Squaresoft, who used to be a first-party dev for Nintendo at the time and for many years prior to that, had grown tired of their policy because they had greater ambitions and they wanted to publish more than just one or two titles per year. Then there's the royalty rate and storage space limit with ...

6510d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

... I wish this were untrue.

At the LEAST, you'll have to wait longer to play the game. And that's the best-case scenario.

6510d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

... is a funny thing.
You point out all the obvious facts.

Also, one of the reasons why people speculate that MSFT paid for it is because they've done it for so many other titles. Proven track record.

6510d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

Remember that word.

In a digitally-distributed market, that term is going to crop up more and more. It basically refers to the process by which the distributor (PSN in this case) QAs the materials they submitted to make sure it won't case any technical issues once released.

It's basically an extra step that doesn't exist in the retail world, and something that's rather unpredictable in terms of how long it'll take. It's a bottleneck as well.

Chan...

6510d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment