I think just like with most of these VR games the issue eventually just becomes the lack of content.
I have VR, owned a Rift since March and seriously don't think more than a day has gone by that I haven't used it for at least an hour. I love it! Full on supporter of VR and I certainly feel that it's the future. It's here to stay, it's only getting cheaper, better, and easier to run and create for. This isn't the 80's or 90's folks, WE HAVE ...
I'm so sick of these articles. Every time the X1X seems to magically get more powerful. First it started as a mystery...then it was "as powerful as a GTX 1070!"...then games started coming out and we saw what was more on-par with the GTX 1060 but NOW we're somehow at GTX 1080 levels?!
Good god...stop moving the goal post. It's like the articles that say unsubstantiated bullshit like "The X1X is more powerful than most gaming PCs!" all while f...
Well that's why I say that I think PCars 2 is a good racing simulator but not really a good racing GAME...at least I distinguish the two. To me GTR2 was a good simulator but had very little actual game qualities. This game is the same.
It's pretty damn good as a racing simulator, much better than the first, but the "game" part still leaves a lot to be desired.
In racing games like Forza or Gran Turismo there's a progression system and monetary systems in place to reward the player. With Project Cars 2 there isn't. The single player campaign basically just has you doing series of races with SET cars one after the other while upgrading your profile stats that ultimately mean nothing. ...
I mean, RE4 has it's ups and downs just like any other decent survival horror game. I enjoyed the hell out of it for sure but to say we've never seen another game like it? Eh. Who is saying we haven't already?
First of all I want a good definition of what a "gaming" PC is. Because even if we're talking an older system with something like a 2600K or 3770K with some older GTX 780 or GTX 970 or something similar then we're talking a pretty "decent" rig still. Even my buddies AMD 290X still has NO issue with modern games at 1080p at max or near max settings. No problems!
So I think if we're talking "true" gaming PC's with actual hardware ...
Nah, they're fine. If people care to watch you they'll watch you. If they want to see boobs then they'll go watch boobs. Having no boobs doesn't help you as those that want boobs still want them.
Get a real job if you want to make money and if you're doing it just for the fun of it then who cares what others do?
I think it's crazy they watch live streams and "donate" money to women on Twitch but not women on actual cam sites that get nude and will do stuff for you.
I guess everyone has their kink...
"but a bit unnecessary"
This is part of the problem. They're boobs. Half the population has or will have boobs. Boobs helped create you. This article is about boobs. Boobs don't hurt you. What is unnecessary about the thumbnail?
Sounds like a failure on the behalf of Twitch's marketing department.
People should be able to watch and donate to whomever they wish. Just because "booby streamers" go away doesn't mean that those that subscribe to them now will just go watch some dudes. They'll go where the women go or will just stop altogether.
So I fail to see, and have to see, a logical argument against boobies.
The only gaming tool I need in my arsenal of kickassery is ye ole' trusty DulaShock 4.
If you say it in a irritated Japanese accent it sounds right.
Your points about power and Nvidia, to me, are really some of the only reasons Switch is doing what the Vita didn't.
Sure, at the time the Vita had decent specs all things considered. For a handheld gaming only device the quad-core A9 CPU, quad-core PowerVR GPU, and 512MB RAM with 128MB dedicated video RAM made the Vita a pretty nice little machine!
But, again, not quite nice enough. It had beautiful games like Uncharted and Mercenary (which I disagre...
@theeze0504
Vita TV? I mean, it is a handheld and besides that one thing the Switch isn't special.
As for Skyrim, again, it's a last-gen game and I'm SURE if the Vita were newer and faster, like the Switch, it would be getting games like it as well. In other words, this isn't something "special" that only the Switch can do or something.
I mean, while I don't really like this idea for consoles as it kills the used games market, for PC I'm alright with it. I don't own a optical drive and haven't for a long time and haven't needed too. For PC it's the norm at this point but we get the option to download games through GOG or "other" sources and make our own physical copies.
Console gamers don't have this choice. Once they move to all digital you can forget about trading g...
I'm convinced MS is paying or giving incentives to dev's for gimping the PS4 Pro version of games. 1080p on the PS4 Pro? Why?
Wolfenstein 2 not having MP and being SP focused doesn't save it from still being pretty boring and mediocre. Being a big fan of the last two in the series (TNO is one of my all time fav's) I found TNC to be a disappointment in nearly every aspect.
Nah, it's a good example that SP games still sell well...but it's a poor example of a good SP game.
It picks up here and there but kept falling for me. Over all don't feel bad, myself along with a lot of my friends found it to be very a very ho-hum game.
Nah, Prey was way better. This game was too long with too many cutscenes featuring too many ridiculous scenarios and unlikeable characters all while making the player look like a cry baby 90% of the game.
I dunno, maybe I'm just bitter, but I think The New Order was wayyy better and found this game to be quite lame and forgettable. Even without comparing it to the first I find it to be mediocre over all.
Eh you'll feel this way for a couple of weeks then like everyone else I know you'll stop playing.