that one doesn't no.
pity it comes with all that toys for big boys shit and a stupid price tag.
must be better this way that having a processor in the thing (that could be hacked), and paying $300 for it instead of half.
more like spore,
it helps that Patcher called the price at $50 months ago. we know what they charge per gigabyte on the harddrives.. why cringe at the price of Kinect?
or you could read what I posted.
the article is very clear that the original story is a farce, my comment was that I'm not happy with where GTA IV went and I don't think GTA V will be any better than what Star claims, even falsely. And while I applaud R*'s efforts with the whole series so far, I don't like where it is going.
There's no need for the game to focus on such violent and objectionable stuff when the prime focus of the game ...
depends on who you talk to, with Sony making 240Hz+ TVs and PS3 being limited to 720p for 3D, there's all kinds of room for a PS4 right now.
"Minority Report. We’ve all seen the movie and the geeks in us loved the motion-controlled computer interface featured on it. Well, Kinect owners will be able to bring this vision to life with the 360 Dashboard update that adds a Kinect-friendly dashboard, with gesture and voice recognition included."
Priceless. I guess author missed E3
you know what? as far as GTA IV deviated from what could have been expected to fly in the mainstream, and did succeed regardless, I can't say that this would be much worse than the fictional GTA IV story, or that I have any confidence in Rockstar making a good video game again without anything this snesational (even if it is pure tabloid fiction).
What can Rockstar do to save face? Demo what they are working on and show the world that they aren't that sick.
agree but only because it is a glowing marital aid.. with vibration.
which is true.
but I'd rather not consider what playstation 4 would cost if it had 8 gigs of ddr4, xdr3, at 3-5Ghz or whatever spec will be around in 2-5 years.
But it would be nice to have more ram and not have to endure painful load times in the next generation because they planned ahead for a change.
http://www.rambus.com/us/te...
Sony wants the money, whatever small part of it they'll get back. Sony would beg Microsoft to support bluray if it was about money.
as long as you meant 3840x1080p >.> , but then ideally the frames are from the same point of view but rendering two offset views of that one perspective not two fully distinct frames. and 120 frames per eye would be glorious.. I don't think even the TVs support that yet.
Maybe in 5 years when all this BS is settled and there's call for true cinematic 2K3D gaming that's just shy, or 10 for consumer 4K3D gaming.
Pity Chris_TC that more people aren't able to buy a $1000 dedicated gaming console.
indeed, they are putting the onus on HDMI to upgrade their spec, why not displayport at this point, when it's not really proven that either console can do 1080p60 3D games.
It is sad that PS3 should be able to do 1080p120 titles but there just aren't any worth talking about, much less playing
not an issue, most gamers are happy with 720p regardless. (not me though, I think you're all idiots who like 720p or playing Wii on HDTVs)
makes a 1080p120(3D) future for Xbox 3 and PS4 too likely.
ditto amd YAY!!!
faster cars, more powerups and better tracks (with more physics and less shit all over them)
I'll polarize her figure.
Sprud, the point of the article is that in development there is no difference between a skilled male coder and a female. what they both offer is skill, opinions and intelligence. Which isn't something the companies are looking for. They just want mouth breathers who can do what they are told. That simply isn't an appealing career.
If anything the female coder will get harrasses and molested AND will want to speak up.
Which you just can't do....
so either you're saying that whatever games that are being made should be sensitive to what women care about, like GTA having a styling salon and being able to play the campaign as a woman, fine,
otherwise how pointlessly sexist a comment is that?
but not any more play worthy.