I would hope not. I would rather they continue to create completely original things or make sequels to their preexisting titles like Baten Kaitos and Disaster Day of Crisis.
The current Team that does Zelda is doing just fine. What the gaming industry as a whole needs right now is more diversity and creativity. We need less people doing what others are doing. The less saturation the better.
Leave big name IPs in the hands of their creators. There is more wo...
What he is talking about has absolutely nothing do with the rules. Its about the fact that rules don't control how things work here.
Fanboy bias runs this site, and the overwhelming bias on this site is in Sony's favor. Anyone who says anything that is in support of another console or not in support of something Sony related gets hammered with disagrees and bubbled down into a oblivion which actually impacts the way you can use this site.
Its goes fa...
The types of scores no one wants to see for Nintendo on here.
Another good review, another empty comments section.
I can't wait to see how the regular Wii U haters spin this. spin this negatively.
Strange how a SNES controller layout added to the Wii U Gamepad looks almost identical to the Wii U Pro controller...yet everyone still insist that the design was lifted from the 360 controller...which was itself lifted from the Gamecube and Dreamcast controllers.
All resolutions that are 640x480 and beyond are high res/HQ.
You seems to me mistaking high res for high def like most people who like to complain/boast about graphics but don't actually know anything about them. Learn the meaning of words before you use them.
The fact that it achieves that on a 6 inch screen makes the quality even more precise.
The Wii U gamepad has an HQ screen and that is more than perfectly fine for the majority of th...
Good review = no response on this site.
Good review = no response.
There is a difference between situations of people assuming something is better, and the devs actually demonstrating it.
We already know from the Trine 2 dev that the Wii U can put out graphics beyond anything the PS3/360 can do. He stated clearly that the enhancements added to the Wii U version would not run on the 360/PS3.
As for game play
Offscreen play is an option, as opposed to being force to do things the same way over and over again, and having to interrupt game play when others want to use the TV.
Also, the screen is high-res, not low res. Learn the difference.
The screen is high-res and the retail cost is over $100.
Learn the meaning of words before you use them, and learn the difference between facts and what you would like to be true.
I dare not touch this article. After reading the comments, pretty much anyone who provides a sound argument for this not being true gets hammed into the ground.
Indeed, people seem to prefer these generalized opinion that don't say anything as absolute answers.
There are some fundamental difference that what each console can do. They have different peak in various attributes.
I doubt any developer would actually say what they are out loud though.
@Hatefanboys.
I never said or even implied the GC was 2 times as powerful as the Xbox1. I only listed the specific attributes within the console that exceeded the relative component in the Xbox1 and nothing beyond that. I didn't say the console as a whole was twice as powerful. The stats are a matter of fact. You can research them. The only ignorant one here is yourself.
I said that it was "overall" more powerful. There were somethings that the ...
That is false.
The GC was actually stronger overall. It had a stronger CPU even though its clock speed was slow(did 3 process per cycle opposed to the 1 process for the Xbox1 on top of other things). It could produce a lager variety of textures effects at once with almost no stress on the GPU do to the use of a TEV instead of Shader Modal 1. Its RAM was over 3 times as fast and its disc read speed was also faster.
The thing is that the GC was much harder to p...
Nintendo hasn't revealed specs since the Gamecube. People begging for them despite knowing their policy is just idiotic.
I think its a decent game but I won't be getting it, and it has nothing to do with not being about action. In fact it being to much about action in the wrong way is one of my main problems with it.
This is nothing like SH or RE. There are no elaborate puzzles, vast areas to freely explore, absolute limited resource or enemy "type" variety. This is a mostly linear tech through zombie infested buildings with characters whom the game doesn't even deem important...
They really did not do anything to enhance that game from the Wii version. No added geometry, no improved textures or anything.
I don't see anything Sony related listed in the tags at the top, so why are there so many Sony fans in here trash talking the Wii U and slamming the people who anyting positive about it with disagrees?
Please, if you want to sing Sony's praises there are three sections listed at the top that you can do it in. Why do come to news that is solely about the Nintendo?
The fanboys on this site are ridiculously defensive to the point that any news that is e...