Is IW their biggest earner? I have a feeling Blizzard brings in more, or maybe they go back and forth ... depending on when their products launch.
Perhaps it's being blown out of proportion. Time will tell on that. Im glad to say that my 80g "Fat" is correctly reading march 1st and connecting to PSN.
No, numbers dont do the talking. Look at crysis, those numbers will blow pretty much any game out of the water... yet, if you ask me, Uncharted 2 looks better than crysis.
I think you're missing the point. This is a well known person in the industry talking about something they have stake in. It's extremely valid. If however you are only upset because you like your Wii, well then stop being upset and just enjoy it.
I have all three major consoles, I can safely say I play my Wii the least and only have it for the major Nintendo releases. In that regard, I think its valid criticism for a third party developer to talk about why they wouldn't develop f...
What about, what was it called, last remnant? I played the demo off steam. The buttons displayed were the 360 ones, I had no clue what buttons did what. Even on my machine which is probably approx 4x more powerful than a 360 it lagged like a son-a-btch. It was utter trash.
Well played alpha... well played indeed.
People that still use DVD's? You mean, the majority of people who watch movies at home?
It only does everything... A PC could do better at half the effort.
Also, before people take this as a PS3 slam, I like the PS3. This just seems pointless is all.
You guys are ridiculous. Do you just spend all day trying to figure out which people are out to get you? I swear PS3 fanboys are just like FOX news. They're the dominant users of this site but act like everyone is out to get them.
You're the fanboy blaster, not Sessler.
Ok, for the most part everyone was staying fairly unpolitical. But I need ask something to those who are equating liberals to people that don't work. What part of liberal means they don't have a job? This is an honest question, because I see that line of thought used all the time and it never makes much sense to me.
Simply put, more money + long dev cycle != better quality.
That being said, I think it looks great. Any one who thinks otherwise probably just doesn't like halo games. Which is fine, but why bother posting?
I swear, pw3 owners are the fox news of this site. You have majority share yet act as if you're completely down trodden upon. No one is out to get you guys. Also, yes I have a ps3. Somehow that didn't make me insane about meaningless review scores about games that we all know are good.
You're as ignorant as anyone else. For one, bring rape into this is callous and stupid. Secondly, why the reference to gears? These games are completely different and warrant zero comparison. Maybe you're butt hurt that it got the great score of 9/10? i don't even understand that. You're childish and foolish, grow up.
Hmmm, you know theres a difficulty setting? Because if you went for the turret, or managed to get on it, with Insane mode on you would be dead immediately. As for the seconds ending, yes, that was lame.
Also, gears 2 changed a ton from the first. It just so happens it was for the worse. Gears 1 was / is a great game no matter what you think of it.
I have a 4870, it ran crysis well but i have a feeling this benchmark is gonna rape my face.
Couldn't agree with ya more, STK.
Religion is silly.
You're a f*cking tool. I hope you realize this. That and you missed you whole point of the article.
F*cking tool...
Lets keep in mind that Activision owns Infinity Ward, Activision does not own Blizzard. Thats why Blizz is still operating exactly how they always have. Blizzard games always take forever to launch, that is nothing new. It's because of this that they're always top quality. Acti can't tell them when to launch a game, blizz adheres to their own deadlines.
Edit: Also, the SC2 beta is sweet... so Im yet to be let down by them.