No issues with cinematics as long as there is plenty of game to go along with them.
Except December numbers appear to have brought sales numbers where Xbox One is now selling over x360. So is x360 now a failure and XB1 a success? Your theory on this is way off.
"If you ain't first you're last........" except in this particular case PS4 was last. Go ahead and make less of it than it is but talking about how poor this is for XB1 when PS4 dropped from 1st to last in the month is telling.
Rare... has-beens? Seems to me like all everyone has been talking about is Sea of Thieves pretty sure the idea of them being has-beens is from people that have no clue how big a game SoT is going to be for MS.
Point being that majority of so-called loot box situations are in fact non-intrusive and rarely effect consumers in-game. How again is "loot crates which come with cosmetic items for the new Avatars system" going to hurt anyone?
The idea anything about loot crates is bad is like saying the marijuana and guns are always bad. They are not... only when used in a bad manner.
It's because it is free. Simple as that.
Whenever I read "Analyst Explains" I immediately hear "Ancient Astronauts Theorists" spoken in the voice of the narrator from "Ancient Aliens".
Except for MS likely has more of a said balance than other companies. so again where is your point leading? Nintendo and Sony lean much more towards internal development than outsourcing. MS has internal development but also equally looks at outsourcing work to developers.
Why is one form of investment so much different than the other in your eyes? Why would the idea of outsourcing be such a bad thing in your eyes?
Is this listed as a PSVR title? I have not seen anything mentioning PSVR with the game yet.
Will have to see if it reaches the level of Spider-Man: The Movie which sold something like 4.5 million for PS2. Likely going to pull some relatively good numbers though. As it has been awhile since we have seen a Spider-Man game.
Assets downloads can be done in the background. Streaming not so much. You would need to download a video to get a reasonable replay viewing of a movie, especially in the US where internet connectivity speeds are some of the worst in the world.
Incorrect. 4K UHD TVs are being adopted faster than HDTVs were in their time. At an astronomical rate. https://venturebeat.com/wp-...
The question is not which console is considered the cheaper and most sellable offering. The question is if the console itself is worth the asking price?
Sure he does. Why would the average consumer purchase a PS3 back in 2006 and now consider that a console with much more power being offered at same price 11 years later be considered not worth the price?
Why would it not be? We have seen consoles in the past that have cost as much or more with far less power behind them. PS3 sold their cheapest version at launch at that exact same price in 2006. And a more expensive version for $100 more.
http://thechive.com/2017/11...
That makes zero sense? It's like complaining that you brought a cake from a store instead of making it yourself for the bake sale.
@Rimeskeem - why exactly are YOU holding your breath? Not like you are vested in Xbox. Are you holding your breath because you are afraid of what another person will be playing versus what you play?
Correct. As Pro has no advantage over X in terms of Hardware. Any advantage that Pro has is only over its own system iterations.
Yea, and I hope it gets the Power Glove support. /s