sources please...
Sony has already stated that they are looking into making psvr work with pc.
http://www.extremetech.com/...
http://www.pcgamer.com/play...
You don't win E3 by showing the same games yet again, then announcing a console with a hype video that states it's a year and a half away. To everyone waiting for the Scorpio, have fun waiting a year and a half for expensive hardware that will not have any exclusives and allegedly provides no benefit if you do not have a 4K tv. Yea MS won with that message.... /s
I don't feel like I should have to wait. You're telling me to wait 1-2 years for hardware, then an additional 2 years for decent games to start rolling out. That's approximately 4 years of waiting to play in your words, 'Flagship full VR games'.
Keep me updated while you wait. Be sure to send me pictures of the microchips you anticipate using and stock images of the games you look forward to playing in 2018-2020. In the meantime I'll be playing ps4. I want my ...
I learned my lesson with destiny. No more 60 dollar online only "it's only phase one" games for me.
Damned if you do, damned if you don't
should be a question of why, not how. Focusing on an engaging story has always allowed the little gameplay irks to be overlooked. Hopefully Devs see this and take notes.
I agree some with the article points. However this is uncharted, it's inconsistencies are consistent throughout the series. UC has always been about having fun. You've always had to overlook the silly ways you can die (based on the nature of the game), bullet sponges and the not so excellent ai. It's still a memorable experience.
This is a new console coming next year. It should at least match ps4 neo, or xbox 1.5. Why handicap yourself out the gate?? It's a brand new console... They should give it up and go the Sega route as a 3rd party publisher.
Have you played Paragon? I was turned off by these types of games as they all seemed similar and hit the market around the same timespan.
Id rather them make a new game, not remake/remaster the old ones. A brand new story with never seen before characters, weapons, levels, the works.
Lost me at "great line-up of exclusive games and with even more to come"
The industry does whatever people are willing to go along with. I guarantee you once all of these 'mid cycle' consoles come out there will be talk of game price increases due to increased dev costs, ensuring cross hardware compatibility, TESTING, etc... The rise from 50 to 60 was explained away in the same manner.
Precedence has nothing to do with it. Just like the idea that snes games were 100 dollars, peoples logic is flawed in that there is also no precedent for a complete hardware replacement mid cycle . IMO the gloves are off as far as price gouging is concerned. I admit 10 dollars is arbitrary, Ill just say price increase next time to not confuse you.
You wont be saying that when neo comes out and your og ps4 is left out in the cold.
on the contrary i was. Most games of that era were 50 bucks, not 100. If you are fine with 100 dollar games then something is wrong with you.
how is it irrational to not want to pay more. seems pretty rational to me. 10 dollars is just an arbitrary number, what if it goes up 20 dollars, is that rational enough for you???
This could be bad if they charge 10 more dollars to cover the cost of testing for neo. Ill probably only buy a couple games a year if it goes to $70. not because i cant afford it, but because $70 for a game is just too much damn money.
@TangentialShark you sound like a child mentioning sony, this has nothing to do with them at all. Secondly no one is mentioning a sony wish list in this thread, its about expectations for ms. If they show gears halo forza scalebound recore and SoT would you consider that a good show? At this stage of its life cycle??
No matter what the success rate is I guarantee they go back to the Joe Danger series. "F*ck all this AAA ambitious bullsh*t, yall whine too f*ckin much" haha