Octopath has the "Nintendo Factor".
I think the X360 version is plausible.
I recommend everyone to read Andy McNamara's article in this month issue of Game Informer. He talks about the change of focus in e3 in recent years and the main reason behind it.
I won't miss it.
I don't. The times are different. Games take a lot more money and time to made than 10 years ago.
If you look at the output of games of Nintendo and Sony with only one system (Switch and PS4) how it's possible to think that split that output can be good? Wii U suffered when Nintendo tried to develop HD games in paralel with 3DS games, and Vita had the same problem.
So, no. Focus on one system.
I'm not saying that Switch has no games like you're trying to imply. What I'm saying is that Nintendo Switch has a lot less support from third party publishers (AA and AAA games) and indies fill that gap.
It was the same in the beginning of PS4 and the whole life of Vita.
Don't take this personal.
Maybe because I'm not a native speaker of english you missunderstood me. Third party support, for me, is different from indies.
Third party is about publishers and AA and AAA games. Indies are games without publishers. When I sad "Indies are the third party support that Switch lacks, like it was on Vita." I wanted to mean that.
I didn't say that it lacks indie support. What I said was that Swich lacks third party support (AA and AAA titles) that PlayStation and Xbox have. So people buy some of Nintendo games and indies in the meantime.
PlayStation 4 had this problem in the beggining with a lack of first party games.
They thrive where library is smaller. Players have limited money and time, and most of them prefer to spend these resources on aa or AAA titles when avalible.
Indies are the third party support that Switch lacks, like it was on Vita.
It's like: they arrest you. Than they give you sunbath 2 times per week. Now they are good guys.
Ready at Dawn seems plausible.
nintendoenthusiast praysing something from Nintendo.
I'm shocked.
But it's trash because Sony didn't include *put some game you like here*.
I'm sick of this kind of opinion piece. "Switch has changed my life", "Switched introduced me to 720p", "Switch made remaster for $60 cool".
No. Because it's cool only when Nintendo does.
If you are a critic you can't be an outsider.
Nostalgia on NES is a really interisting case where most of people developed feelings about a console that they didn't have.
Time to write articles saying that it's too low and too late for PlayStation.
Who cares?
I'm not sure if more than 6 million copies and a metacritic of 93 is under anything.
This sounds like a port begging.