CRank: 5Score: 13060

In Japan, it's a complete exclusive. No matter how you try to minimize this, it would be understandable for anyone in the Xbox camp to feel a little betrayed (I'm talking the company, not its fanatics).

As I said above, it wouldn't have needed elaboration if the thought hadn't crossed SOMEBODY'S mind within the company.

4236d ago 3 agree3 disagreeView comment

Yeah, a win-win for everyone, not just a single brand (which is what you seem to be eluding to). They didn't have to be Sony exclusive to ruffle feathers, otherwise, Phil wouldn't have commented in the first place.

4236d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

Um, too many generalizations to take this seriously. "PS fans don't know how good Bungie is". How would you know that? This is a business. Go read up on just WHY Bungie wanted to create their own stuff, free of Halo. Has nothing to do with Sony, PlayStation, or any of its fans.

The fact that it bothered you means you take the console "warz" personally.

4236d ago 36 agree5 disagreeView comment

Your opinion is your opinion, but I think the franchise has spoken for itself. If you think Uncharted has had no impact and influence on modern cinematic titles, you've been living under a rock.

4237d ago 16 agree5 disagreeView comment

A lot of things "seem" unlikely. Doesn't mean this guy won't get approved again.

4237d ago 10 agree0 disagreeView comment

The dude just posted some of the most influential games of our time. If anything, he's just what I've been saying is wrong with some in the industry - the feeling that he's entitled to something.

In the future, I'll make sure not to take many of his articles serious.

4237d ago 33 agree5 disagreeView comment

Do some of you actually read what you typed before clicking "submit"? The Last Of Us, a single-player/multiplayer title, is just an "interactive story"? Deary me...

OT: 60fps confirmed now for both modes! Fantastic!

4237d ago 13 agree0 disagreeView comment

Not really. It's still 25k behind it. It caught them up, for now, in the US, but elsewhere has had no impact at all.

I can only assume that people didn't truly take it as a "price cut". It's more of a removal of the Kinect (the one major thing that helped differentiate it from the PS4).

4237d ago 8 agree2 disagreeView comment

Yes, because Naughty Dog has a history of: "all talk an no show". /s Some of you people need new material, the "no-show" talk has worn thin.

OT: Hyping it up like crazy! It's like the game is releasing for the first time all over again!

4238d ago 14 agree3 disagreeView comment

Except that neither him nor Jaffe were EVER "one trick ponies". Your post even contradicts itself in regards to that.

OT: I never new Cliff was in retirement.

4238d ago 21 agree0 disagreeView comment

You don't have to be a "fanboy" to know what a studio is known for. Being that The Last Of Us is the most awarded game in history, it's totally understandable why people are not worried about a Remastered (yes, that's a BETTER version) Edition.

4238d ago 17 agree3 disagreeView comment

Um, if you already pre-ordered it, why do you need to see it? That should have been the other way around. Pre-ordering early sounds like you knew exactly what you were getting.

OT: Just 29 days. Can't wait!

4238d ago 21 agree0 disagreeView comment

As a PC gamer, the platform is still missing many of the exclusives that help the consoles stand out. That's why I enjoy the best from both worlds and THAT'S, for certain, the best experience!

4238d ago 10 agree2 disagreeView comment

Um, it has no predecessors. Beyond that, "hype" may have dwindled, for some, but not for others.....many others (myself included). Always annoys me when people think they speak for everyone. If you no longer want the game - simple solution, don't buy it.

Quite frankly, I don't care if I've already shot at monsters in other games (if similarities are TRULY an issue, then you shouldn't be playing practically anything today). Not everything has to innov...

4239d ago 8 agree3 disagreeView comment

They aren't abandoning it because they have a history of supporting their consoles for the long term. Making profit on the PS3 is just part of what comes from that.

4241d ago 12 agree0 disagreeView comment

How would you know what can easily be done? Unless you worked on the game, you don't know what's gone into it.

Besides, you insinuated that, as a cinematic game, 60fps should be the norm (meaning they all should run like that). I'm telling you that they are MANY types of cinematic games, and without knowing everything that goes into making them, you can't know what fps they should all run at.

4241d ago 25 agree1 disagreeView comment

1. There was never any mention of an Aug release date.

2. There's too much hype for a game with a known history? I think otherwise.

3. Nothing embarrassing about bundling it, either. Many people didn't get to play it on PS3. The bundle makes perfect sense.

4241d ago 29 agree0 disagreeView comment

Um, there are many kinds of cinematic games. No, they don't all have to be 60fps - (the notion actually makes no sense at all).

4241d ago 32 agree4 disagreeView comment

I hear this thrown out a lot, but quite a bit of the Remasters have seen upgrades the last gen machines couldn't hope to achieve.

In essence, it's no longer just a "last gen game".

4241d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Errr...1080p was the first thing they confirmed about the game, or have you not been keeping up?

4241d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment