There are no two ways around it: When you have to churn out more frames, the graphics take a hit. But sometimes fluidity (60fps) is preferable to eye candy that you see at 30fps.
You can have graphics that do the job at 60fps, and everything in motion looks much better than it would in 30fps.
I hope you are not claiming Rage, Gran Turismo, Forza 4 has *bad* graphics. Noticeably_FAT doesn't claim Forza 4 would not look better in screenshots if it was a...
This is why I'll be waiting for PS4 slim. These games will make the waiting much more easier.
YOUR a very funny person.
Thanks for not writing "Should of" :)
Any type of DRM would be cracked, but at least the programmers are having their fun. I think that was the point. It would be funny to mock people that complained about this in their official forums, for example.
I never had any problems with firmwares till now, but BF3 crashed twice on me, it never did before. But this is also after the BF3 patch, and I have only played for a few hours and not any game else.
Will they play sHooters?
Razer Hydra has so much potential. It is unfortunate that Sony had to do with camera tracking tech, and the fact that razer Hydra has analog sticks on both hands and dual wielding is standard, it allows more than what Move can achieve.
I still believe the missing analog buttons, and a minimum of two motion controllers as standard is Sony's missed chance.
But I guess you also notice the difference between 30fps and 60fps.
There are quite a few factors for noticing resolution increase, the size of the screen and your viewing distance are the most important ones. But most games have a lot of moving things, which is enough for me to differentiate the fps increase.
60fps adds a frame for each frame you see on 30fps, it provides more samples to the eye per second. I can very easily differentiate between 30 and 60fps, and prefer the looks of 60fps.
60fps really adds a lot. It's not just the input delay. Everything *in motion* looks and feels much better at 60fps. Things look more natural that way, 60fps feeds more motion information to the eye.
The feeling of a 720p 60fps fast-action game is orders of magnitute better than 1080p 30fps. However, since 1080p will be the buzz word for nextgen, I think will be seeing more 1080p than 60fps.
I was so bad with the Move on KZ3. Not that my DS3 performance was spectacular, but I found Move too cumbersome for turning, couldn't get used to it. There are some people owning with Move, though.
I made a feature request to counter flashlights, behold the squint button:
http://s1141.photobucket.co...
@Kurain
And that justifies invading countries that aren't actual threats?
You're right to not believe any of them, but I don't think U.S. can claim to be the good guy in its Middle Eastern affairs, when they can bomb a country to stone age for WMD's, resulting in the deaths of a few hundred thousand people, and then go "ooops, my bad, no WMD's, but at least that Saddam was annoying, wasn't he?".
Currently, bashing Iran is the new trend. You can tell it when they sneak in Iran jokes / references in shows in seemingly unrelated places. So it's not a surprise.
I still feel nauseous when Bush made that "tongue-in-cheek" presentation for not finding WMD's, that's supposed to be readied in as little as 45 mins as they lead us to believe.
http://www.guardian.co.u...
Yes, it would have gone multiplatform by now. I thought it would be lifetime deal or something.
Exclusively? That would be awful for gamers and EA.
I'm in the same camp. The lack of analogue sticks is making my brain itch. Here's me babbling about it pre-launch:
http://www.ps3blog.net/2010...