I wonder when they'll reveal it. Semi-insider Tidux on twitter is on record saying it'll be revealed before E3 and keeps on tweeting about AC
Edit: It says 49 BC in the top right corner too, that confirms the time period. Here's a clearer version https://pp.userapi.com/c637...
Geeez, people are getting way ahead of themselves. Take a close look at that BOAT, it'll mainly be for transport. Fighting may be possible, but not in scale, capacity or style it was in previous games.
Nope, PC version was just the Xbox 360 version.
Some comparisons here
http://www.neogaf.com/forum...
It's Assassin's Creed 2017. He brought up Egypt in 2013, the leaks point to his team and his schedule falls in line for a 4 year dev cycle that ends in 2017, which is exactly what the leak suggested
Money
Who cares? I thought Final Fantasy games had no continuity
It is repetitive, the ending in all 3 game is th same. I get the "meta" meaning of it but dark souls 3 comes off lazy story wise.
It's like they thought people would like a sharpening filter that aliases the whole image. What a mistake, they should have just stuck with 900p and fxaa. It would've made the image soft, but not this blurry AND aliased mess. Second, what the hell kind of physics middleware are they using? 1 pillar being broken or a simple particle effect shouldn't half the framerate.
I'm also going to include Deus Ex: Mankind Divided on my personal list because I am that confident that it will that good
Ayy, that's pretty good
They would have been better served just putting Duscae out, a real vertical slice of the game.
The demo was meh
$500 for a bundle and $400 is not an appealing price
Wait for the Incursions update in April
AMD and Nvidia are launching their mid range cards early summer, they're just not going to be using HBM2. Probably HBM or GDDR5X
I can't even, just did you even watch the video? He's ranting that they called a HAT iconic, they didn't mislead about the quality or abilities of said hat. They used a word that in shape or form affects the product or misleads people. If something is truly iconic people will associate thing by themselves, if not a company will try to make it iconic by repeating it in marketing.
They called a HAT iconic and that's the main rant in this video. In what world is it reasonable to make a 10 minuterant because they used a adjective to describe clothes. It's not misleading about the clothing physically, it's trying to drum up a mental image that people like. You know, regular marketing.
This maybe the dumbest thing I've ever watched. Using words like iconic is a effing marketing ploy. It is so incredibly pointless to get angry over a word.
It's a 4 year dev cycle (double the usual) and the first reoccurring team since Patrice Desiltes got the boot. It better be good
Except that Egypt is also a part of the middle east. https://en.wikipedia.org/wi...