Cool. It looks better than the first one.
The truth is, resolution is one of the least important things in terms of how good a game's graphics are perceived to be. Of course, if the resolution is too low and the upscaling algorithms used are poor then image quality might start to appear fuzzy. But for the most part what do you think is going to look better: Killzone 3 at 720p or COD MW2 at 1080p? Obviously, Killzone 3 will look better.
You should be terrified. They'll be on you like attack dogs the second you say something that could kinda, in some round about way, be construed, if you really think about it, as something negative against the PS3. lol
Heck, I actually like my PS3 quite a lot, but I always get stuck defending the 360--or actually to put it another way--sticking up for common sense, which as you can imagine doesn't go over too well with the PS3 loyalists around here.
...
Can you please list some of these action adventure titles that were coming out like every 2 days? I think you are exaggerating. A lot.
You're an idiot. We didn't even get mods at all on consoles in past generations.
The rest of your post was just typical whiner bullcrap. Every generation has gotten better, but crybabies like you are too blind to see it.
That's probably when you started gaming.
So if GT5 gets a 94 or 95 and is far better than Forza 3, then I guess we can also say that Halo 3 is far better than Killzone 2, Gears of War is far better than Uncharted 1, and so on.
I agree with you, I actually liked the Chronicles of Riddick movie (and Pitch Black).
Halo is a deep universe and as far as shooters go has a story that I can get into more than most.
PS3 fanboy alert! Do not attempt to reason with subject!... Rational discourse is impossible with such a creature... Best to quarantine and move on with more productive endeavors.
Absolutely, Halo Reach has outstanding graphics.
You're delusional. Do the nurses realize you aren't in your padded room any more?
Halo Reach has essentially the same themes and graphical approach that it always did.
I have both and you are full of crap, period. Everything from bringing up the dash during a game to sending messages works a lot smoother on the 360.
You must be partially blind. If Halo Reach looks like a PS2 game then so does Killzone 3. They both look similarly good.
What some of you are forgettng is that other journalists have said almost the opposite.
Computer & Video Games said the 360 version was the best looking console game they have ever seen.
They were shown the 360 version and they said "Crysis 2 is the best looking game on console."
Why Crysis 2 is the best-looking game on 360 (and PS3)
ht...
Then why is it the PS3 versions that usually have longer load times and force you to do partial installations?
Where is your proof that it can't hold its own against "any PS3 graphical heavy hitting title"?
PS3 exclusives are way overrated anyway. People like you act like they are on some whole other level when they really aren't.
The other thing is that you say 'PS3 exclusives' but really you just mean a couple PS3 exclusives...and even those are not as good as you pretend.
You say there is no game on the 360 that rival...
Compared to what? The friendly AI in most shooters isn't that good. People complained about some of the stupid behavior Rico and Garza had in Killzone 2 for example, and it is like that in most shooters.
Also, how many games even let the friendly AI drive vehicles and stuff while you ride in the back, shooting the mounted gun? What you said isn't really true anyway. When I jump in the back they always take off driving, unless they are waiting for other marines to ...
LMAO, you're hilarious. Halo 3 has some of the best AI of any shooter, period.
Of course since these aren't actually human beings with brains they will sometimes make mistakes, but the AI in general was extremely good in Halo 3.
No they didn't. That isn't true. The engine was written for the 360. Halo 3 looks way better than Halo 2 in every way. The textures are way better, the HDR lighting is way more advanced, the geometry of levels is much more complex, there are more enemies, the AI is smarter, the physics are better. The list goes on and on. Now Halo Reach has improved all of that even further.
Why is it that when the PS3 is the lead platform and the 360 gets the port it still looks just as good as the PS3 version, but when it is the other way around the PS3 versions often look inferior?
If you really think it makes sense to believe that after 4 years the supposedly more powerful console still can't regularly produce better performance on multiplatform games you are extremely out of touch with reality.