CRank: 5Score: 48670

Oh wear to start, firstly I think it entirely plausible that this particular costume had the unfinished model in the game accidentally and this is the finished version. It would be censorship if they were censoring the more revealing costumes as well if makes 0 sense to censor this one costume and no others.

Now onto the flip side: I can see why if you perceived this as censorship you would be annoyed given the promises not to censor stuff.

Now for some ...

693d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

What a nonsense bit of clickbait. They know nothing about if it is or isn't included (it is) ramble on instead of just getting to the point. Really quite irritating tbh.

696d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Lol I'll agree the character doesn't look like the person she was supposedly modeled upon but idk why that is. I don't like all of Ubisofts business practices but this nonsense about the crew is getting redicilous. They only removed it from people's libraries because you literally can't play it anymore. That is the sole reason . You only need an online connection to install this game because presumably it doesn't all fit on one disc and they didn't want to use two ...

704d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

It was a good remake that improved on the original and was a fun game. What more do you want. Also the stuff in the comments suggesting that they made this because calisto protocol was announced is some serious fucking nonsense. Do you know how long it takes to develop a video game these days. This was done from ground up. It took longer than 2 years.

704d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

You know how long it will have taken to make this game, this is some rediciulous logic.

704d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

This has been a thing for awhile at this point it pretty much is the norm.

706d ago 0 agree4 disagreeView comment

Um it's one bonus mission not all jabba hutt stuff...

706d ago 1 agree7 disagreeView comment

Or it means they hired more people to meet pandemic demands. Demands that aren't as high anymore so they need less staff.

713d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView comment

By all accounts they are late signing contracts with amd, behind Sony who did so years ago but want to try and launch a year before. If they achieve that it means the next Xbox hardwsre has been rushed and will just be off the shelf pc parts. A prebuikt pc especially if the comments about steam and epic games are anything to go by.

714d ago 6 agree2 disagreeView comment

Sony have an excellent track record each gen of supporting their previous generation hardware for years after the next gen releases. Microsoft don't. Hell don't have even released exclusives exclusive to the previous gen after the next gen has released before.

714d ago 7 agree5 disagreeView comment

So basically they'll abandon Xbox hardware and start selling premade PC's yeah I could see that.

714d ago 40 agree9 disagreeView comment

The engine needs updating because realistically loading screens in the next elder scrolls aren't acceptable. Maybe one short loading screen when like you leave a city or something but realistically in 2020's that shouldn't be needed. Assassin's creed has been able to do it without loading screens for years now, harry potter could do it, the Witcher does it so on and so forth. Hell no mans sky manages without loading screens.... Cmon.

715d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

The game was essentially given away. It must have cost like 500m minimum to create and market maybe more. No way did it sell.... What 7.2 million sales would have been needed if MS recieved 100% of each sale to break even with a total Dev budget and marketing budget of 500 million combined. I suspect once marketing is factored in it cost more than that. Without games pass, those kind of sales figures are viable but with it, no way in hell. Which ofc is why it will get a ps5 release eventuall...

715d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Desperate much?

726d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

We'll see, either Microsoft are praying then a truck load of money to bring it over, or they are willing to see if it will sell. If it's the latter then Xbox gamers better show up to buy it- if they don't square enix won't bother again.

727d ago 15 agree12 disagreeView comment

Switch 2 might be able to tbf.

727d ago 14 agree3 disagreeView comment

The monetisation stuff is absolute FUD. I played the first game and the elements such as fast travel crystals are intentionally scarce. A major gameplay mechanic is the travelling from point A to B and the risk Vs reward of avoiding travelling at night or getting stuck out in the wilderness in the dark. The micro transactions added to the steam store have not impacted the games design at all. Everything is fairly easily attainable in-game (I mean I got 300;RC points last night alone - and I d...

729d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

Pretty sure almost all these games offended people and were controversial at the time of release and had attempts to ban them- which largely failed. How the hell they missed the GTA games and manhunt games idk or maybe GTA doesn't fit their narrative.

734d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

I mean the Devs have said they want people to just play and have fun not do the whole meta build thing and optimal ways to complete every mission and that they will deliberately alter things to prevent that. Also this is giving terrible advice. It is saying Todo main missions first despite the fact that stalkers are such a pain in the arse that if you have them destroying the nests before there are so many they overwhelm you is a must.

Also destroying the spore things so y...

734d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

It was reliably leaked just a month ago that MS hadn't signed contracts for next gen till literally weeks ago- the same leakers that correctly leaked that hi fi rush and pentiment and sea of thieves were going to ps5. So this is very very very unlikely- if not impossible. Also it's way too early....

734d ago 5 agree4 disagreeView comment