All Channels
Popular
CRank: 5Score: 80250

I'll have see more before I get my hopes up at all. I appreciate the preview but from what I've seen it looks nothing like what I would have hoped.

Then again I'd be content if they would just release the original as a PS1 classic on the store so I could dl it and play it on my psp :)

5477d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

Yeah definately no reason it shouldn't considering the PS3 supports it.

5477d ago 11 agree1 disagreeView comment

Blizzard and Starcraft II say hello.

5477d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

How have they dropped move support? They just announced a Resistance 3 bundle with the MOVE sharpshooter included.

Socom 4 just released with... the MOVE sharpshooter.

5478d ago 18 agree7 disagreeView comment

So now disagreement means misunderstanding? The only misunderstanding here is that Activision thinks it can continually rape consumers/gamers without cause for backlash.

Wake up Activision, if you continue to kick the very people who put you where you are you will find yourself beaten at your own game.

5479d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Then again, its not cutting into the cheap 500GB HDD that I could put in my PS3 so ... yeah.

5479d ago 8 agree1 disagreeView comment

It isn't cutting into my 500GB....

5479d ago 4 agree2 disagreeView comment

It just doesn't look fun to me. Looks to be to much of a pain. I clearly haven't tried it so I don't know for sure but from watching the video it seems it would just annoy me, especially if I didn't get my hand movement just right.

I haven't tried the Sharp Shooter either but as far as shooters go I am more interested in using it then what they are doing in this video. The idea of holding a firearm, or replica incase of the Sharp Shooter just seems to be m...

5479d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

Exactly, couldn't be anything further from what made Xcom, well Xcom. I'd be happy if Sony just put XCom UFO Defense on the store as a PS1 classic so I could play it on the go on my PSP, that would make my day.

This, this abomination however...

5480d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

It may in fact be a 'looking glass into the past' but it doesn't deserve a free pass unless its also free to play.

Fact is the old Duke Nukem games were great, I loved playing them, but that doesn't mean this one gets a free pass, especially when I have to pay for it, if anything that should mean that this one should be as good as the old ones and nothing less. It would be one thing if there were as many Duke Nukem games as there were Final Fantasy games and ...

5480d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Have a bub for answering the question.

5480d ago 5 agree0 disagreeView comment

There will be so much rage if this game fails on release. They've had nothing but time.

5480d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

I'm not even giving this site hits. The price is pretty spot on and Day 1 for me.

5483d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

So get the wifi version and use a mobile hotspot from another carrier. If your letting a contract 3g service spoil that much gaming fun you have some issues as a gamer.

5483d ago 7 agree1 disagreeView comment

$249 wifi version is Day 1 buy. Have my money Sony, well played and well done!

5483d ago 8 agree4 disagreeView comment

Yeah I caught that too. Was like "did he just say you can chat regardless of what game your on" No one in the crowd made a sound.....

5483d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

I'm fine with their apology. Blame the a-holes who caused the issue from the get go. Sony knows they jacked up, they gave out free stuff, apologized several times, provided ways to monitor you identity via the identity theft programs. What more do you people want?

It happened, we can't go back and take it away now, but they are doing everything they can.

5483d ago 5 agree0 disagreeView comment

Yeah no joke.

5483d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

Um yeah no. Uncharted 3 all the way man.

5483d ago 7 agree1 disagreeView comment

lol at the clearly lack of understanding involved in their line of work.

5484d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment