I know right can't believe just saving your game to the cloud is locked behind a paywall!!!
Anyone with an xbox already knew this, just shows how many people here actually do not own xbox
You call it tryhards, i call it becoming more and more focused on what their fanbase are asking for.
It certainly is another box they will have to untick.
This is what i am interested in, surely if you did not pay to play online, you would just play on PC, i don't get it.
I think the following is correct :-
You can chat one on one with a person of your choosing for free.
But you needed gold to join a party chat.
Good for those that only play f2p games.
Genuine question, who in this day and age, buys an xbox or a playstation to not play games online?
Me personally have paid to play online since it's launch date, i just do not get why you would buy a console, which nowadays are built with online at the forefront, would you then just play offline games?
How many is that these days? 5 or 6?
If you do not plan on playing games online, then surely you would just go the PC route?
@Spenok
Oh i agree, but chances are if we looked at Playstation articles written by Sony fan sites, we could probably find the same situation.
All in all bad article, but i remember N4G jumping on news.xbox.com when they worded games as only on xbox, were you one of those as well? that was an OFFICIAL MS website, but still copped the wrath.
"Don't worry about me"
What?
"Cool, I OWN around 400 hundred games on disk and digital on just PS4 and I have PSNow."
Congratulations, i have around 2-300 games on disk covering xbox OG, xbox 360, and xbox one, and i currently have 289 games installed on my Series X (most from gamepass), and what? what's your point?
"I don't even have time to play all the games I already own and I ...
I think you need to understand the english language better, go back and re-read my original post a few times.
I clearly just asked how you knew it was a paid article, nothing more, untwist your pants.
This section right here "it can only not be a claim, when it is verified fact"
Means that something can only be a "claim", when the "claim" in question can not be a verified fact. If the "claim" can ...
It's only like how Sony sites mention that Kena is only available on Playstation and not PC.
https://www.playstation.com...
Why would an xbox centric site, advertise for PS?
They obviously mentioned Switch, as they have a little partnership/relationship going on.
@rakentaja
Think you triggered a good response with that comment lol.
On topic, i'm really looking forward to the xbox lineup in the next few years, after all i own an xbox so why would i not be lol :p
I'm not even entertaining this article with a click.
Gamers should just buy the console with the respective games they want to play on it.
"It is paid and dumb article. It is obvious."
So, because you think it is obvious, it is paid for? I'm not the one that is delusional buddy, if i see a positive/pro playstation article, the first thing when i read it is not "this must be paid for, it's obvious", i just read the article, and either agree or disagree with what is being claimed.
"It just proves how you are delusional Xbox fan who actually thinks that XSS is a...
"Or have a ps5 and PC. Still no real reason to buy an xbox. At least for me"
But what if you do not currently own a PC? choices are :-
1 - Series S @ £250 (ish)
2 - Series X @ £450 (ish)
3 - Gaming PC @ £1200+ (ish)
#commonsense
"Even Sony are bringing their games to PC."
That is not the same!!! (say all PS fanboys) /s
@neutralgamer1992
"While you have a valid point sony so far have brought handful of older titles."
Still a good few :-
https://www.pushsquare.com/...
lol "console peasant"
That made me chuckle, in regards to your comment, i am in the process of building a new PC, so i will soon be joining the PC gang.
So in a nutshell
Series X version outperforms PS5 version in resolution/textures
PS5 version smashes Series X with that 2 second load difference.