Seriously, not one word mentioned of the remastered visuals. Nothing was even said about the 7 new levels offered in the Lost Chapter mission or the ROE expansion.
All I read was, lighting not as good as today blah blah, sound not as good as today blah blah and a confusing paragraph about multiplayer, where is it, is it over here, no, over here, no.....which way did he go, duh.
This wasn't a review nor read like a professional one. I would question ...
First Rob Ferguson a month and a half ago and now Cliff, wth is going on over at EPIC. The Gears franchise looks in doubt.
Kevin VanOrd the reviewer on Gamespot is their best reviewer and he has been there a long time, I trust his reviews and I watched his video review, he makes a STRONG case for the score he gave it.
There is no reason to get mad at the reviewer because you may think he slated a franchise you love, I adore the RE series, but lets call a spade a spade. RE6 has some bad game design decisions that make for a poor experience....maybe Capcom will learn a lesson from this.
I see the PR department on this game are burning the midnight oil to get back in good graces of it's fans.
Their first excuse was that Ironside was to old to do the motion capture and they couldn't do the voice acting seperately, which we know is BS, because tech does allow them to be done seperately.
Now they say that Ironside didn't want to do the voice work seprate from the motion capture.
So, which is it Ubi? I smell BS...
but with MS showing little interest in IP's, I will wait awhile before I decide to get the next xbox. With the backlog of games currently and all the great games coming next year, plus I have my PS3, so I won't be hurting for games.
This will give me time to see where MS goes with the next xbox and will not plan on getting it until I see a number of true exclusives that would make it worth getting, if they don't I can play my 360 until they turn XBL function of...
yeah but Microsoft is not interested in RARE doing anything other than Avatar items and Kinect titles. I don't see a KI3 or Banjo 3 in the cards, so this would be the best effort to make something close, I wish them the best and if it looks good, I will support.
Ever since Tomonobu Itagaki left Team Ninja, things haven't been the same and in a bad way. Ninja Gaiden 3 is utter crap compared to 1 & 2 and now the new DOA sounds like crap as well. The new head ninja there must go before poor sales shutter that development team, as NG3 sold poorly, I can't imagine this doing much better.
I think there is some truth to what you said. Between the fan reception of their recent games and pressure from EA probably became to much to bare.
I envision a scene between the two doctors, where they sat down and discussed what was going on and they probably came to the conclusion that this was just not what they wanted to do anymore. Thus they are leaving just like they started, together.
I wish them the best, they created some fun times for me an...
v0rt3x you may think this is good, but if you case study RARE. They didn't get better when the Stamper Brothers left, in fact many gamers would probably say, it was all downhill from there.
You could be right or seriously wrong, once these founders direction is no longer evident in the development process.
First, I don't care for the Wii U controller, however, the Wii U pro controller has no tablet and has a 360 layout, which is perfect. Also, for those of us into that genre, look into Ninja Gaiden 3 Razors Edge, I have played NG3 on 360 and was disappointed in the title and very critical of it, but from what I have seen Razors Edge looks much improved.
Additional characters to play, in game weapons, not some BS DLC to purchase after the fact and I see they brought disme...
Only sold 2 million copies? I hear this all the time, but I got to tell ya, I think 2 million copies for a new IP in this genre is pretty solid.
Yet another article fanning the flames of gamers who are disappointed it is Ninty exclusive. Can't these so-called journalists yet it go. Let the healing began and stop writing articles about disappointed gamers.
Nintendo for years has been about supporting kids, casuals, and fans of their franchises. They attempted to gather support from more core gamers with the Wii with some mature titles like Mad World, but it failed.
So why are they announcing a game like Bayonetta that oozed brutality and sexuality in the first game. It doesn't fit.
What is really going on here? Is it a quick grab at core gamers who loved the first and pull them away from PS3/360 or i...
How do we know that Ninty was the only publisher interested? I have not seen any evidence that other publishers weren't interested. All I have read was because of SEGA's financial situation, it was rumored that Bayonetta was cancelled. Us gamers have no idea if SEGA shopped the game to anyone else other than Ninty.
Anyone that would pick up the rights to Bayoneta 2 would be called a savior, but we will never have proof if others were ever contacted to begin with....
I agree 100% and this is where the disappoint comes from, yet others feel the need to talk those of us down or rub it in our faces....it is a sad thing really.
If Ninty is publishing how then is it third party exclusive? hmmm?
Another author that is fanning the flames, stop writing articles about this and let those that are disappointed heal and move on. I think authors that fan flames are hating on those that are disappointed. Catch my drift, let it lie.
Another author that is fanning the flames, stop writing articles about this and let those that are disappointed heal and move on. I think authors that fan flames are hating on those that are disappointed. Catch my drift, let it lie.
Don't worry the way things are going it won't be long now.
Why just between those three games mentioned in title? Right now Borderlands 2 has been best fps for me this year, but Far Cry 3 wasn't mentioned either.
Also, lets not forget that Dishonored is first person and can be played with alot of shooting and I bet it will stand taller than COD, MOH, and maybe even Halo 4.