They don't need to but they should. But I also think they should wait until the next gen to do so at a grander scale. I mean they already have a bunch of cross-play with Steam and with Xbox is the next step. But they need to make sure that they are not taken advantage of, the structure needs to be even at financial and gameplay level between X and PS.
Got to be linked with sequels announcement...I certainly hope so.
Maybe because the mass mostly never buy new stuff but will almost blindly buy into sequels of popular series...
I platinumed both Origins and Legends, loved the games so much, but I know nothing about the prior Rayman games so of course I would probably want a follow-up to those two.
Nuff said, I can't believe it's not here yet.
That game got shafted bad. Game "journalists" had a QTE fever and were having none of that. I still say the graphics were awesome, the story was pretty cool, the gameplay really good, but yeah, uneven. The length of the game wasn't that bad. Was it perfect, not at all, I'd say it's a 75-80 game. At the end of the day, that uneven gameplay is what I hated, it felt that some elements were like a real good looking sundae but I was told I could only take a sppon out of it. ...
GoW, Spidey and Days Gone would be enough to make it a great year, and there's more.
1 and 2 could be very cool, don't care about the 3 others. AV, please make like a 15.99 dlc or standalone CTR remaster!!
I only really hated the multiple endings, I don't know where I'm at in the completion but at some point I quit.
I strongly disagree, they're a good opportunity to explore more of a world than only a main story, it could have benefited to a game like 1886. But what open world games need to get better at is the main story line. I liked Horizon (and how some side missions tied to the main), Far Cry 4, but like some of the Assassin's Creed games I could barely tell what the game was about, Watch Dogs 2 was okay. The Arkham games are a great template for a mix great main / side missions for an open ...
Somewhere in March is very likely.
I agree, I played it for an hour and I was like, this is supposed to be GOTY, no thank you.
That's like asking if the Browns can win the Superbowl if next year they start 2-1. The main reasons the Wii was their most successful home console was that it was cheap and the tech was new and available to everyone even elderly people, the Switch is none of that. So besides the Wii, there hasn't been a very successful Nintendo home console and nowadays where the competition offers things the Switch does not, I don't see it reaching the top spot ever. Don't get wrong, it'...
This is so reminiscent of the attitude team XBOX had for the first few weeks after the presentation of the X1.
Just like Disney used the new Star Wars to f*** movie theaters.
Sure, just like they absolutely needed online pass years back not to lose money off second hand games...bla bla bla...First day DLC and microtransactions are business choices, you risk losing customers on the off chance you'll get more than the initial 60$. It can pay for sure, but it also can kill you're product.
I kind of feel with this kind of controversy, the publisher has one shot and they blew it on the 75% bs, oh well.
Probably true, I'm getting it on BF and I only played CTR and that level from Uncharted 4.
It received criticism and rightfully so, though some went way to far, but this was a very cool game. They showed us way too much potential to not make a sequel, that's for sure.
Even though I had a PS2 and PS3, this was my introduction to the series and needless to say I liked it a lot. I really hope they also do the sequels.