Shaking fist at sky.
CRank: 5Score: 43780

“It’s not pay to win, more like pay to progress faster.”

Paying to progress faster is paying to win. Imagine you go to work and find out your coworkers were all promoted before you because they bribed your boss.

737d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView comment

The Switch 2 has to compete with the Switch.

737d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

I don’t like pay-to-win. Tacking on these kinds of microtransactions is extra onerous for a $40 game. It means you are paying $40 to lose.

737d ago 4 agree2 disagreeView comment

My ad block works great on N4G. Videogamer.com is still a mess after blocking ads.

738d ago 5 agree0 disagreeView comment

I have never seen such a garbage website. Unreadable.

738d ago 15 agree0 disagreeView comment

Until Phil says it, I don’t believe. This generation was supposed to have an Xbox appliance similar to the Apple TV or Sony’s failed TV box. I really don’t see how a Microsoft handheld will be attractive to consumers if Microsoft is publishing games for the Switch 2. Consumers will just buy a Switch 2 so they can play Zelda and Halo. Microsoft would have better success with a Steam Deck competitor like an iPad Mini sized Surface tablet with removable controllers.

739d ago 3 agree6 disagreeView comment

I get it. Most households have one console and staying faithful to Xbox means losing out on all of Sony’s exclusives. It wouldn’t be so bad except Sony’s exclusives are some of the best games ever made. Now Microsoft is telling you that your reward for your fidelity is watching PS5 owners enjoy all of the games that were supposed to make your Xbox special.

739d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Microsoft could have brought backwards compatibility at launch instead of TV, TV, TV. That would have forced the hand of many Xbox 360 owners to upgrade to Xbox One. Instead they launched a console that couldn’t play old games and gave Xbox 360 owners an off ramp to PlayStation land.

740d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

“influencers”

So if Microsoft paid them enough, they would say whatever Microsoft wants.

740d ago 14 agree2 disagreeView comment

Ok. Time to start selling Halo on PS5.

741d ago 26 agree1 disagreeView comment

When you pay $70 to $100, you don’t want to believe you bought a bad game.

741d ago 11 agree2 disagreeView comment

A 5/10 from IGN is like 1/10 in the real world. Takes a mighty disappointing game to get them to break out of 7/10.

743d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Did you say that after E3 2013?

743d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

New or upgraded subscriptions.

744d ago 7 agree0 disagreeView comment

What incentive does a developer have to improve the Game Pass version. Developers only get paid once for Game Pass.

745d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

“Then loads of articles saying it’s amazing 9/10.”

Please don’t lie.

745d ago 7 agree4 disagreeView comment

The James Gunn “The Suicide Squad” movie is universally loved. If you haven’t seen it, you are in for a treat.

745d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Sell the Xbox brand to a Chinese supplier like when IBM sold the Thinkpad brand to Lenovo? Not going to happen. The Xbox brand is built into Windows OS and all of Xbox’s exclusives (if there will be exclusives in the future of Xbox) are made by Microsoft Studios. I don’t think Microsoft would exit the gaming hardware business. Consoles like N64 were successful money makers and they didn’t sell as much as a Xbox Series S/X is on track to sell.

745d ago 1 agree11 disagreeView comment

Sony also makes 30% of every software purchase on the PlayStation store. So does Microsoft on the Xbox store, except the growing marketshare of PlayStation means more money for Sony and less for Microsoft. Software is agnostic to hardware marketshare.

746d ago 6 agree1 disagreeView comment

Is Palworld free?

747d ago 5 agree0 disagreeView comment