lol at some of the comments in here. Have you seen one single game that looks TWICE as good as as the X1 equivalent? Shit, even the multiplatform games that PS4 fanboys like to beat their chest about dont look look that much better. Killzone look twice as good as Ryse? Use logic people. Also, if you don't want to, or are incapable of logic, use the facts of what we know is inside these systems.
Not even sure why i'm bringing myself down to your level for a reply... but have you even played any X1 games?
Also, not every game with guns in it is COD.
To the three idiots above...
Ko us just saying they didnt reject the second coming of Christ. Who knows how this game will do. It's not like they rejected some critically acclaimed multi-million copy selling game.
The stupidity here never ceases to amaze.
A couple big investers does not mean "MS wants to sell off Xbox". If MS as a whole wanted to sell of XBOX, they would have done so already.
Thuway? Really? We're still treating him like he has a shred of credibility? The same guy that backed CBOAT on the "final titanfall textures are the same as Alpha" yet the Beta (not even final build) has better textures?
Stop treating anything CBOAT and/or Thuway say as news. Its not news. At BEST, its sketchy "insider" info that is usually wrong.
LOL, one negative (and not even THAT negative) article and a ton of positive articles. This is the one that you choose to base decisions on?
Every great game ever created has had at least someone who wasnt as fond of it. And every Awful game ever created has had at least someone who was fond of it.
I think you need to pay more attention to the ratio of Positive to Negative reactions as the beta launches.
@Unreal01...
If you base all ...
Titanfal comes out in a few weeks. Destiny comes out in months. Pretty obvious that the game coming out sooner would be hyped more right now. Why would bungie and co. want to compete with titanfall's hype/media machine right now?
First negative article I've found SO FAR today. Everyone is welcome to their own opinion. I didn't get a chance to play the Alpha, and am hoping to get into the Beta.
So because a dev says something positive about MS and id@xbox we should immediately think it's a ploy by MS? Why wouldnt we give the dev the benefit of the doubt, like we do with any dev that says something positive about Sony?
Ridiculous. Every dev that says great things about Sony and/or negative about MS are speaking the truth, but any dev that has something negative to say about Sony and/or positive about MS must be getting paid or its all a ploy by Sony?
With some of their big games, they haven't really "milked" them to the point they've run them into the ground. Say what you want about Battleifield, but each one is it's own uique game, for better or worse. I didnt care much for 3, but BF:BC2 was amazing, and i'm really enjoying 4 (even with its current issues).
If a franchise is successful, why shouldnt they monetize it? It costs a rediculous amount of money to develop these big games. The more they...
So after reading through the comments, i feel relieved, knowing that N4G hasn't changed. Positive xbox article: MS PAID OMFG! Negetive article: Everyone bash and bubble up!
All this article is about is a Developer that says ID@xbox is right for them. Who the fuck are all of you idiots to say that he is being money hatted or is a "shitty" dev?
Sometimes i wonder why more developers don't leave the industry. So many gamers are complete asshole...
Hilarious that you get disagrees for this statement.
Only on n4g!!
To your point, it is good to see. Time will tell if this is a trend or just one developer's experience.
I'll have to respectfully disagree with your last point. Pretty much every person i know that owns an X1 is super excited for this game. I think people will be surprised how many copies this sells on X1.
Agree, the marketing campaign will be epic. Hopefully we get some cool ads, maybe something as aweseome as the mad world Gears of War trailer. Or the Gears trailer with the Devotchka song playing.
@McScroggz
There is no implication. Its just saying "Xbox one games". These are xbox one games, right? Makes sense to me. Nothing is implied. If I own just an XBOX One, and I want to know what games are coming out for it, do I give a shit if they are also coming out for other systems? Nope. The article and it's headline never lie or imply.
The stupidity of people turning everything into something it's not is what will ruin gaming as a whole. Not eve...
Where in the title did it say "exclusives"? Its just an article informing people of games coming out on the xbox one soon. Good god people... Learn to read.
@quaneylfc
Pretty sure the game servers themselves are MS based . It will still tie into EA servers somehow with origin and what not though. As long as EA isnt handling the actual game hosting and has nothing to do with matchmaking, i think it will have minimal bugs.
Will be very interesting to see how the upcoming beta impacts the pre-orders. I'm guessing we will see a HUGE jump in pre-orders during the beta.
I'm so ready for this. I didn't get into the Alpha... Sign me up and take my money!
1080 hd video output means nothing. Educate yourself. All it means is that the system will OUTPUT the game at 1080. Not that the game is rendered at native 1080. MS could put the same thing on their boxes, since every game that isnt 1080 (JUST LIKE THE PS4) will be upscaled and output in 1080p. I'm not arguing that the PS4 has more native 1080p NATIVE games, only that the wording in that picture is pointless.
Honestly, MS and SONY could both put that on every single game...