All Channels
Popular
CRank: 5Score: 85460

A pivot to Sony (typical) doesn't change that the game has disappointed a lot of people. When things are hyped beyond what the results show, this is the consequence. PlayStation is not at fault for what's going on with Starfield.

Thus, it sounds like you're in your own nightmare.

1006d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

First post on the site. Says it all.

OT: Looks incredible!

1007d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

@Julion0715

Opinion has been spammed in multiple articles. Word-for-word. Yes, it loses weight.

Come to think of it, you should cover your tracks better than that. :P

1007d ago 4 agree2 disagreeView comment

A. It's 6 million PLAYERS, not copies.

B. Why'd you use Final Fantasy? That's not even PlayStation's biggest launch. It's Ragnarök, and that sold 5m in 5 days.

Xbox has no exclusive that has ever done that, and unless they (Microsoft) state otherwise, Starfield didn't either.

1008d ago 19 agree5 disagreeView comment

Answer — ask the reviewer who made the claim.

1009d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

But the Xbox-centric sites get a pass for perfect scores, yes?

1009d ago 26 agree4 disagreeView comment

In other words, you're guessing. Got it.

I'll take his word until proven otherwise.

1009d ago 6 agree2 disagreeView comment

If his claim is false, prove otherwise.

1009d ago 7 agree3 disagreeView comment

Yea. Blame the "ponies" for the game's critical reception not reaching the heights many of Starfield's ardent fans claimed it would...

1009d ago 15 agree3 disagreeView comment

PS5's biggest games (Demons Souls, God of War, Horizon, Last of Us, Ratchet, Returnal, etc) are all above an 84 on Metacritic and not are not considered disappointments. Starfield was hailed as the "next great ....", "the turning point for Xbox", etc.... and all it has mustered is an 84 Metascore (lower than every one of those games). Besides, "80% Metacritic is not 88% (if we're being technical), but no one said 84 was a bad score. Only that it's nowhere ...

1009d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

Did you actually READ the question or decide to wear your heart on a sleeve to defend a plastic box? Some of you are seriously annoying with this. EXPLORATION - which one does it better? He presented it as he saw it.

It’s not that difficult.

1015d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

@blackblades

A ripoff is not an answer to anything.

1024d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Sure, Jan.

1025d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Clearly it did, as Square said they were happy with the result.

1027d ago 2 agree5 disagreeView comment

Phil, leave Sony, and its games, out of your future equations.

I swear, they’re obsessed with Sony. Like watching a 5-year-old trip over his own feet with his shoes untied while he runs towards the candy shop.

1027d ago 6 agree0 disagreeView comment

Folks, this is sparky…. Why is anyone even engaging him? Sony is killing it right now and this is the nonsense he comes up with. Don’t waste the energy!

OT: Of course, they continue to kill it!

1043d ago 11 agree1 disagreeView comment

In fairness, he also condemned it when the reviews made it clear that this wasn't anything to praise.

1045d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Typical with Sony sequels. Pay it no mind - the game will release to great reviews, break records, and articles like these will prove their irrelevance once more.

1046d ago 33 agree6 disagreeView comment

Sony can receive plenty of competition and it not be from Xbox. This is always the thing that plucks at me "Sony needs competition, Xbox can't go away". Sure it can. Present them with a WORTHY competitor.

1049d ago 8 agree3 disagreeView comment

Yuuup.

1051d ago 19 agree6 disagreeView comment