Agreed.
Not a bad game, just not on the level of this year's best.
What games does Starfield "s**t" on?
Spider-Man is the last example you want to use. It literally mollywhops anything Xbox puts out AND is developed in-house. Just stop.
They didn't "learn" anything. They've always had the softer approach in regards to storage. The Vita was the outlier.
The PS3/4/5 have all been better about storage.
" People buy this game for multiplayer."
Right. The 4/10 single player, on its own, would not outsell the games you mentioned.
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/0...
Nothing "interesting" about it. It's simply a tough time for the tech industry.
That's ...... not how it works at all.
"Less powerful" is even a stretch. The latest discussion on this with Digital Foundry put a lot of things in perspective.
They've been buying major publishers for the past two decades? Interesting.
There is no evidence that they would have gone all in with Jim. They'll do what they normally do would do — dabble. People were worried in 2010 when they introduced the Move and I said the same thing: their core business model would not change. And it didn't.
They know what they're doing and have seen 4 highly successful PlayStation consoles, so they deserve a little benefit of the doubt when it comes to handling the brand.
Sony actually needs to keep doing what they’re doing. They’re business is BOOMING right now! A risk here and there? Sure. It just doesn’t need to come at the expense of their current model, which is their most successful yet!
I don't think I've ever read a more LAUGH-OUT-LOUD inducing headline than this in all of my years coming here.
Hurt MY feelings? Once again, if someone replies with "Xbox xbox xbox", it's clear that they are affected by something more than they should be. You then double down with some BS about N4G (like this place is immune to trash talked about anyone else but them).
Plus, I thought you were leaving? You can't help yourself. XD
I thought you were done? :P
Answer: it's just as much a PlayStation/PC adventure as it is Xbox.
I mean, if someone responds to you with a factual correction and you reply with "Xbox xbox xbox", I'm not sure what kind of response should be expected.
If someone replied with "Ps ps ps", I'm sure you would wonder what is going on, especially if nothing wrong was said to you.
If you actually have a counter argument to this being a multiplatform game and how "A multiplatform adventure in the jungle" was a "nasty reply", I'm all ears.
I'll even help you... what is the counter to this being a multiplatform game and why is that a nasty reply?
"Insulted" — says the guy running around like a headless chicken trying to convince folks to care about his favorite box. Ok champ!
I mean, you can say that to yourself while you're drugged up on Xbox pills. Changes nothing. :)
*A multiplatform adventure in the jungle.
@Lightning77
"It also outperformed FF16, RE4 and Mortal Kombat sales. And yes I have my facts ready in case of any objections".
Present those facts. What did those games sell WW and show us how they compare to Starfield's current WW totals. And (this is key) what's the split between Xbox and PC?