All Channels
Popular
CRank: 5Score: 85460

Agreed. Excellent performance, yes, but hardly insane.

938d ago 8 agree2 disagreeView comment

+143% > -52%

Next time someone really wonders what a beatdown is, point them in this direction.

939d ago 8 agree2 disagreeView comment

Thanks WindowsCentral. I needed a dosage of comedy!

940d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

Like the 10-15 years before it? :P

943d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

What aspects? From what I played, it did nothing better than other games and certainly didn't do anything substantially better. So, my curiosity remains.

945d ago 27 agree2 disagreeView comment

Exactly @lazerphaserb

Just watch how Hellblade 2's launch goes. The "movie game" trash talk will cease to exist, and they'll want everyone to "respect" the graphics/story/etc.

945d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

@Lightning77

"It also outperformed FF16, RE4 and Mortal Kombat sales. And yes I have my facts ready in case of any objections".

Present those facts. What did those games sell WW and show us how they compare to Starfield's current WW totals. And (this is key) what's the split between Xbox and PC?

945d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

Agreed.

Not a bad game, just not on the level of this year's best.

945d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

What games does Starfield "s**t" on?

945d ago 31 agree4 disagreeView comment

Spider-Man is the last example you want to use. It literally mollywhops anything Xbox puts out AND is developed in-house. Just stop.

950d ago 8 agree2 disagreeView comment

They didn't "learn" anything. They've always had the softer approach in regards to storage. The Vita was the outlier.

The PS3/4/5 have all been better about storage.

951d ago 7 agree5 disagreeView comment

" People buy this game for multiplayer."

Right. The 4/10 single player, on its own, would not outsell the games you mentioned.

957d ago 22 agree2 disagreeView comment

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/0...

Nothing "interesting" about it. It's simply a tough time for the tech industry.

959d ago 8 agree4 disagreeView comment

That's ...... not how it works at all.

959d ago 11 agree0 disagreeView comment

"Less powerful" is even a stretch. The latest discussion on this with Digital Foundry put a lot of things in perspective.

960d ago 8 agree0 disagreeView comment

They've been buying major publishers for the past two decades? Interesting.

961d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

There is no evidence that they would have gone all in with Jim. They'll do what they normally do would do — dabble. People were worried in 2010 when they introduced the Move and I said the same thing: their core business model would not change. And it didn't.

They know what they're doing and have seen 4 highly successful PlayStation consoles, so they deserve a little benefit of the doubt when it comes to handling the brand.

963d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Sony actually needs to keep doing what they’re doing. They’re business is BOOMING right now! A risk here and there? Sure. It just doesn’t need to come at the expense of their current model, which is their most successful yet!

963d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I don't think I've ever read a more LAUGH-OUT-LOUD inducing headline than this in all of my years coming here.

963d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

Hurt MY feelings? Once again, if someone replies with "Xbox xbox xbox", it's clear that they are affected by something more than they should be. You then double down with some BS about N4G (like this place is immune to trash talked about anyone else but them).

Plus, I thought you were leaving? You can't help yourself. XD

965d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment