well i'm a 360 owner, a 360 fan, a future PS3 owner and a PS3 fan. so it matters little to me either way. who it REALLY sux for is 360 fanBOYS!
what are you talking about? PS2 demolished the Gamecube in sales in Japan, and its almost 50% bigger.
Uh oh, EA thinks PS3 will graphically edge the 360 in its second generation games. LET THE SLAMMING BEGIN!
MOST people on this site prefer the 360 also. as a matter of fact, MOST people think Sony are arrogant, MOST people think the PS3 will be too expensive, MOST people can't wait for Gears of War or Halo 3, so now what?
well that sux. if the game'll be ready then just release it. don't try to stall to counter the PS3 launch. Oct. was a long enough wait...but Nov.?
when i saw the 2 cool votes and the 3 lame votes i just knew this article must've been good news for Sony. lo and behold it was. it's sad: PS3 gets so much flack around these parts, and in some cases (such as this one) its very undeserved. 360's interface is good, i'm not arguing against that: it's not great, but decent enough. anyone with a few minutes should be able to figure it out. but if PS3's interface is anything like PSP's, then it'll be better, plain and simple.
why does everything article have to turn into a flam war?
listen, i know you're trying to prove a point to gamerrific, but you must know that you REALLY are hurting the 360 don't you? PC ports may be good if they're ports of good games, but it is also bad as it points out the 360's lack of originality. also of note: most sites are unanimous in their assertions that anything below a "9" is just a GOOD game, not great. anything above a "9" is considered great/classic, while 9.8's and 9.9's (and in some cases 10's) are reserved f...
as a matter of fact, only a few games look as good as GOW, and only a handful (Heavy Rain, MGS4 and Crysis) look better. but Army of Two DEFINATELY looks good. another one i'm keeping on my radar.
looking good. not sure how it will appeal to the American 360 crowd, whose like seems to lie exclusively with fps'. this could be the game to spur the 360's sales in Japan however. hopefully. i myself am DEFINATELY keeping this on my radar.
neither of you work for Crytek, Sony or Microsoft. you at least have some credibility with your argument Ruffryder, SOME, but still nigh nil at best. the fact that Crytek has announced that they're preparing to utilize their latest CryEngine for a PS3 game at least says that this is a reality: they've figured out a way to do it, and they WILL. you jiggajayp are hopelessly enmeshed in the realm of fanboydom. no comment to you otherwise.
don't jump down bill's throat too much. his logic is no more flawed than most of the other 360 and PS3 fanboys who help turn this site into a cesspool with their senseless garbling. however, he could use a lesson or two in the formation of proper sentence structure. i for one am glad that Crysis--or at least some rendition of a game featuring the CryEngine--will be making its way to the consoles. now i don't have to immediately invest hundreds of dollars in upgrading my PC to Vista. whet...
don't really agree with the caveat. but i STILL can't help but find it kinda funny lol.
what i'm really waiting for is Assassins Creed. i most definately want Double Agent for the 360 though. sux that it got pushed back...to late Oct. was it? never really got into Rainbow Six...to this day i couldn't tell you why. i does look good though. guess i'll just read more into it as the game develops.
sorry about that omansteveo. i wasn't trying to imply that you were a fanboy. its just that on this site its hard not to get used to all of the bickering that goes on between both camps, and read fanboyism within it. with the exception of some of the greats (MGS, FF, GT etc) you'll get no argument from me that sequel get old rather fast. i just don't agree with you about Warhawk. the original is so old and so long forgotten that the new one can almost be considered a new IP.
besides Kameo, what original games did the 360 have at launch? imo 360's light didn't really start to shine until GRAW, months after its launch. i'm not interested in Motostorm myself, but Warhawk is a whole nother story. the game has been in hiatus for nigh 10 years, so i don't really see how it can even be considered a rehash, especially since the original was so great. and if Incognito can deliver on their promise of in-depth 3rd person shooter action (and i have naught but faith in In...
what does that have to do with this article? do i have to remind you to "Keep your comments relevant to the news story."
thats merely a matter of taste omansteveo. if you wanna comment about Sony being arrogant then you'll get no arguments from me. but when you start attacking games, two of which (Warhawk and ATV Offroad) were lauded in their heyday, then your argument is dead in the water.
now see, i'm a in the middle guy. i could careless about either Sony or Microsoft. i DO, however, like 360 and will like the PS3. but what i DON'T like is blatant fanboy unfairness. if you're gonna compare prices landofsand, do it with fairness. don't compare the cheapest 360 to the most expensive PS3 as a means to try to prove your point. even with the cheapest PS3 (at $500) you're getting more than you would with the premium 360, Blu-ray notwithstanding. now, whether or not you want ...
yeah, and the PS2 version will probably outsell them both.