Yes, the line up is one of the worst ever. Zelda does not making up for it all, GOTY or not.
They said there wasn't going to be a game in 2016, which there wasn't. There probably will be one this year.
No, just clickbait at its finest. They even admit it in the original article.
"Before we go any further, let me just say… no matter how we try to justify it, it’s impossible to prove, by “Science” or otherwise, that one game is definitively better than another. Saying that a game is “Scientifically Proven” to be better or worse than others is just an attempt to add some zing to the numerical formula doing all the work behind the scenes."
Sony has dominated since they started. They only lost last gen because Nintendo got lucky with their gimmicky crap. PS3 still had the best games.
Don't call people fan boys if you are already claiming that Zelda is greater than Horizon, when you obviously haven't played Zelda and probably haven't played Horizon.
Means nothing without numbers.
Uh what a dumb article. He was simply trying to show that the game is getting high scores. It doesn't prove that Metacritic is important.
So where's the PROOF of all this outrage? Not that I would be able to read it anyway.
Some nice bait by Target in that ad. Nearly the whole page is about Switch and the "buy two, get one free" headline is directly below the console.
If you want a different game, get a different game. Mass Effect is going to be Mass Effect.
Clicks. It is ridiculous.
We won't really know until the game is released. If the core game compares similarly to past releases, then you're right... no one has any right to complain.
However if the core game is lacking compared to the past, people could have a reason to gripe.
It is somewhat odd, especially since the review doesn't even mention any specific negatives. The worst thing it says is "It’s a deep and ambitious package, and even when it falls short, it’s fun and intriguing. "
First of all, it certainly is not newsworthy for something every time a user thinks he has been wronged.
Secondly he has provided no evidence to prove anything.
Lastly he actually did admit to using macros, which was harmless in his case, but it is against the TOS.
Random player claiming he was wrongly banned = news?
And isn't Nintendo known for doing that?
Phil the Savior is turning out to be a bigger clown than the previous guys.
Sony won EVERY month worldwide.
Too hard to avoid the constant articles on N4G about Phil Spencer's tweets.
What is funnier is all the Nintendo fan boys flocking to dislike the video. There's no denying this is an issue. Why in the world did they put it on the very edge of the device?