Yes the PC version definitely has more foliage and it's looks more Crysis and detailed. But in the comparison video the console version clearly has better lighting and Crytek confirmed this.
The console version uses the new lighting system which I think they used in Crysis 2, the old one doesn't have it.
@turgore: You must have face palmed yourself after spouting out such a nonsensical claim.
Then why couldn't they just call it Xbox 2? everyone knows that the successor of any console is going to be all around better.
Using Microsofts logic the next Xbox should also be called Xbox 360 since it will be a complete evolution of the current console.
Is that all it was, no new features just a dumb ad.
Although the environments in both games look like crap I have to say PD have done a splendid job on their premium cars because they still look so much more detailed and just better all around.
One thing I like about Forza 3&4 is that it's consistent with it's car models whereas GT5 has HD PS2 models. It's the level of inconsistency and bad decisions that made me dislike GT5.
But I still love the premium cars in GT5 since I've never really ...
This is actually a mockery to a franchise known for quality, this update will only make the game look more half-assed. Although I've lost all hope for GT5 I have incredibly high hopes for GT6 since I still have faith in PD.
Because for some stupid reason MS called the Xbox 2 the 'Xbox 360' (they still haven't explained what the 360 stands for) so we all just assumed the next console would have an even dumber name like the 'Xbox 720'.
I wouldn't be surprised if they call it the 'Xbox flying Tyrannosaurus Rex'
If you can read I did say I wasn't following any of the news relating to the console version since I have other things to do so I was totally unaware of this.
Can you give me proof since I haven't really been following any news on the console version of Crysis 1.
They never utilized those 5-6 years properly and it shows in the way Kazanouri Yamauchi would talk in interviews about the development of GT5 and the in the released game itself.
You can have 50 years of development but still release a shoddy game because you never utilized the time correctly.
I'm not a Forza fan but why is it that Turn10 can a accomplish so much more in 1 year than PD can in 5? The previous GT games prove that it's about the amount o...
Although I don't own an 360 I can tell you that Turn10 releases FINISHED games, not games that are half done and still need months of development. The only reason I still don't like Forza 4 is because it looks like an arcade game.
GT5 is ONLY NOW getting features that hundreds of fans were asking for during it's first 3 years of development and even months before release.
PD's priorities were not set and they had no idea what they were doing b...
Although it's probably one of the best looking games on console it sill lacks the level of detail the PC version has, here just look at this: http://cache.gawker.com/ass...
The same spot in the game yet the PC has a completely different feel to it. But Crytek tried their best I guess and the game still looks good.
He wasn't talking about the graphical capabilities of phones.
It sold 6 million because of the franchises history and because it says "Gran Turismo" on the box. Six million were sold but about four million were sent back, one million are gathering dust and the remaining one million copies are actually being used.
I myself like every other PS3 fanboy hyped up GT5 to death and it was one of my most anticipated games this gen, but it turned out to be the biggest disappointment this gen.
There's a massive difference! games haven't even scratched the surface of reality. The game looks really good but it's still noticeable for many obvious reasons.
Is this Vita newer than the TGS one because the slopes at the top and bottom of the screen have comeback.
EDIT: Okay the original prototype had sloped edges at the top and bottom but the start/pause & PS buttons were flush with the face of the device. Then at TGS11 the slopes were removed but the Star/Pause & PS buttons were no longer flush and the rubbery grip on the analogue sticks were had more surface area.
Now the slopes, larger rubbery surface a...
If the PS2 games are said to be in their original form then how will our PS3's be playing them then? This makes absolutely no sense. The Cell would obviously be doing some type of emulation to play these games and if that's the case why can't Sony just bring back B.C to all PS3's?
Sony were probably hoping no one would notice but I definitely have and now I want some answers. Why can't you just update the PS3 to support physical PS2 games? Thanks to those ...
If they put up every PS2 game on the PSN then the PS3's library of games would be overshadowed by it.
The majority still think it is a controller.
The Frostbite 2.0 engine is doing way more than UC3's engine. UC3 looks very cartoony and vibrnat compared to BF3 which is why it may look better. UC3 anmation are gret when he's leaning against a wall, but the animations of him jumping out of cover or from ledge to ledge look really choppy and sometimes one running animation to another looks really bad as well.
The A.I looks to be same as the first one.
Well it definitely looks better than KZ3 and GeOW3